Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
Nächste Überarbeitung | Vorhergehende Überarbeitung | ||
ee2:task_ddjurcpk494go2q1_with_calculation [2024/07/15 16:57] mexleadmin angelegt |
ee2:task_ddjurcpk494go2q1_with_calculation [2024/07/15 21:37] (aktuell) mexleadmin |
||
---|---|---|---|
Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
{{tag> | {{tag> | ||
- | # | + | # |
<fs medium> | <fs medium> | ||
Zeile 11: | Zeile 11: | ||
{{drawio> | {{drawio> | ||
- | 1. What is the magnitude of the magnetic field strength $H$ at $\rm (-0.1 ~mm | 0)$ and $\rm (0.55 ~mm | 0)$? | + | 1. What is the magnitude of the magnetic field strength $H$ at $\rm (0.1 ~mm | 0)$ and $\rm (0.55 ~mm | 0)$? |
- | 2. Plot the graph of the magnitude of $H(x)$ from $\rm (-0.6 ~mm | 0)$ to $\rm (0.6 ~mm | 0)$ in one diagram. Use proper dimensions and labels for the diagram! | + | # |
- | + | ||
- | 3. What is the magnitude of the electric displacement field $D$ at $\rm (-0.1 ~mm | 0)$ and $\rm (0.55 ~mm | 0)$? | + | |
- | + | ||
- | 4. Plot the graph of the magnitude of $D(x)$ from $\rm (-0.6 ~mm | 0)$ to $\rm (0.6 ~mm | 0)$ in one diagram. Use proper dimensions and labels for the diagram! | + | |
+ | The magnitude of the magnetic field strength $H$ can be calculated by: $H = {{I}\over{2 \pi \cdot r}} $ \\ | ||
+ | So, we get for $H_{\rm i}$ at $\rm (0.1 ~mm | 0)$, and $H_{\rm o}$ at $\rm (0.55 ~mm | 0)$: | ||
- | # | ||
\begin{align*} | \begin{align*} | ||
- | C & | + | H_{\rm i} &= {{I}\over{2 \pi \cdot r_{\rm i}}} \\ |
- | & | + | & |
+ | H_{\rm o} & | ||
+ | &= {{+3.3 A}\over{2 \pi \cdot { 0.55 \cdot 10^{-3}~\rm m}}} \\ | ||
\end{align*} | \end{align*} | ||
- | # | + | Hint: For the direction, one has to consider the right-hand rule. |
+ | By this, we see that the $H$-field on the right side points downwards. \\ | ||
+ | Therefore, the sign of the $H$-field is negative. \\ | ||
+ | But here, only the magnitude was questioned! | ||
+ | # | ||
- | # | + | # |
- | $C = 1.1 ~\rm pF$ | + | * for $(0.1 ~/rm mm | 0)$ : $H_{\rm i} = 5.25... ~\rm A/m$ |
- | # | + | * for $(0.55 ~/rm mm| 0)$ : $H_{\rm o} = 0.955... |
+ | # | ||
- | 2. Calculate | + | 2. Plot the graph of the magnitude |
- | # | + | # |
+ | * In general, the $H$-field is proportional to ${{1}\over{r}}$ for the situation between both conductors. | ||
+ | * For $H(x)$ with $x$ within the inner conductor, one has to consider how much current is conducted within a circle with the radius $x$. \\ This is proportional to the area within this radius. Therefore, Ther formula $H = {{I}\over{2 \pi \cdot r}} $ gets $H(x) = {{I}\over{2 \pi \cdot x}} \cdot {{\pi x^2}\over{\pi (0.1~\rm mm)^2}}$. This leads to a formula proportional to $x$. | ||
+ | * For $x$ within the outer conductor one also gets a linear proportionality with a similar approach. | ||
+ | # | ||
- | The displacement field is given by: | + | # |
+ | {{drawio> | ||
+ | # | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. What is the magnitude of the electric displacement field $D$ at $\rm (-0.1 ~mm | 0)$ and $\rm (0.55 ~mm | 0)$? | ||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
+ | The magnitude of the electric | ||
+ | Here, for any position radial to the center, the surrounding area is the surface of a cylindrical shape (here for simplicity without the round endings). \\ | ||
+ | This leads to: | ||
\begin{align*} | \begin{align*} | ||
- | D & | + | D(x) &= {{Q}\over{A}} \\ |
- | &= \varepsilon_0 \varepsilon_r | + | |
- | & | + | |
\end{align*} | \end{align*} | ||
- | # | ||
- | # | ||
- | $D = 146 \cdot 10^{-9} \rm {{C}\over{m^2}}$ | ||
- | # | ||
- | 3. Calculate the charge difference between both plates | + | So, we get for $D_{\rm i}$ at $\rm (0.1 ~mm | 0)$, and $D_{\rm o}$ at $\rm (0.55 ~mm | 0)$: |
- | # | ||
- | There are two ways now. Either: | ||
\begin{align*} | \begin{align*} | ||
- | Q &= C \cdot U = 1.1 ~\rm pF \cdot 3.3 ~ V = 3.6522... ~pC \\ | + | D_{\rm i} &= {{Q }\over{2 \pi \cdot r_{\rm i} \cdot l}} \\ |
- | \end{align*} | + | |
- | Or: | + | D_{\rm o} & |
- | \begin{align*} | + | & |
- | Q & | + | |
\end{align*} | \end{align*} | ||
- | # | + | Hint: For the direction, one has to consider the sign of the enclosed charge. |
+ | By this, we see that the $D$-field is positive. \\ | ||
+ | But here, again only the magnitude was questioned! | ||
- | # | + | # |
- | $Q = 3.65 ~\rm pC $ | + | |
- | # | + | |
- | 4. Due to a production problem, the right-side layer is covered with a contaminant, | + | # |
- | The contaminant has $\varepsilon_{\rm r,c}> | + | * for $(0.1 ~\rm mm | 0)$ : $D_{\rm i} = 31.8... ~\rm uC/m^2$ |
- | Give a generalized formula | + | * for $(0.55 ~\rm mm| 0)$ : $D_{\rm o} = 5.78... ~\rm uC/m^2$ |
+ | # | ||
- | # | + | 4. Plot the graph of the magnitude of $D(x)$ with $x \in \rm [-0.6~mm, +0.6~mm]$ from $\rm (-0.6 ~mm | 0)$ to $\rm (0.6 ~mm | 0)$ in one diagram. Use proper dimensions and labels for the diagram! |
- | The resulting capacity | + | |
- | Therefore: | + | |
- | \begin{align*} | + | |
- | C = {{1}\over{ {{1}\over{C_{\rm air} }} + {{1}\over{ C_{\rm c}}} }} | + | |
- | \end{align*} | + | |
- | With | + | # |
- | \begin{align*} | + | * In general, the $D$-field is proportional to ${{1}\over{r}}$ for the situation between both conductors. |
- | C_{\rm air} &= \varepsilon_0 \varepsilon_{\rm r, air} {{A}\over{d-x}} &&= \varepsilon_0 A {{\varepsilon_{\rm r, air}}\over{d-x}} \\ | + | * Since the charges are on the surface of the conductor, there is no $D$-field within the conductor. |
- | C_{\rm c} & | + | # |
- | \end{align*} | + | |
- | This leads to: | + | # |
- | \begin{align*} | + | {{drawio> |
- | C = \varepsilon_0 A {{1}\over{ {{d-x}\over{\varepsilon_{\rm r, air} }} + {{x}\over{ \varepsilon_{\rm r, c}}} }} | + | # |
- | \end{align*} | + | |
- | # | ||
- | # | ||
- | $C = \varepsilon_0 A {{\varepsilon_{\rm r, air} \cdot \varepsilon_{\rm r, c} }\over{ {(d-x)\cdot{\varepsilon_{\rm r, c} }} + {x\cdot{ \varepsilon_{\rm r, air}}} }}$ | ||
- | # | ||
# | # |