Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

Link zu dieser Vergleichsansicht

Beide Seiten der vorigen Revision Vorhergehende Überarbeitung
Nächste Überarbeitung 		Vorhergehende Überarbeitung
Nächste Überarbeitung Beide Seiten der Revision
electrical_engineering_2:magnetic_circuits [2023/06/12 11:36]
ott 		electrical_engineering_2:magnetic_circuits [2024/05/03 16:02]
mexleadmin [Magnetic Circuit with two Sources]
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
-====== 5. Magnetic Circuits ======+====== 5 Magnetic Circuits ======
  
 <callout> For this and the following chapter the online Book 'DC Electrical Circuit Analysis - A Practical Approach' is strongly recommended as a reference. In detail this is chapter [[https://eng.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Electrical_Engineering/Electronics/DC_Electrical_Circuit_Analysis_-_A_Practical_Approach_(Fiore)/10%3A_Magnetic_Circuits_and_Transformers/10.3%3A_Magnetic_Circuits|10.3 Magnetic Circuits]] </callout> <callout> For this and the following chapter the online Book 'DC Electrical Circuit Analysis - A Practical Approach' is strongly recommended as a reference. In detail this is chapter [[https://eng.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Electrical_Engineering/Electronics/DC_Electrical_Circuit_Analysis_-_A_Practical_Approach_(Fiore)/10%3A_Magnetic_Circuits_and_Transformers/10.3%3A_Magnetic_Circuits|10.3 Magnetic Circuits]] </callout>
Zeile 405: Zeile 405:
 $k_{21}$ describes how much of the flux from coil $1$ is acting on coil $2$ (similar for $k_{12}$): $k_{21}$ describes how much of the flux from coil $1$ is acting on coil $2$ (similar for $k_{12}$):
  
-\begin{align*} k_{21} = {{\Phi_{21} \cdot \Phi_{22} }\over{|\Phi_{21} \cdot \Phi_{22}|}} {{\Phi_{21}}\over{\Phi_{11}}} \\ \end{align*}+\begin{align*} k_{21} = \pm {{\Phi_{21}}\over{\Phi_{11}}} \\ \end{align*} 
 + 
 +The sign of $k_{21}$ depends on the direction of $\Phi_{21}$ relative to $\Phi_{22}$! If the directions are the same, the positive sign applies, if the directions are oposite, the minus sign applies.
  
 When $k_{21}=+100~\%$, there is no flux in the middle leg but only in the second coil and in the same direction as the flux that originates from second coil. \\  When $k_{21}=+100~\%$, there is no flux in the middle leg but only in the second coil and in the same direction as the flux that originates from second coil. \\ 
Zeile 422: Zeile 424:
        &= k_{21}                  \cdot {{N_1 \cdot N_2 }\over {R_{\rm m1}}} \\         &= k_{21}                  \cdot {{N_1 \cdot N_2 }\over {R_{\rm m1}}} \\ 
 \end{align*} \end{align*}
 +
 +Note, that also $M_{21}$ and $M_{12}$ can be either positiv or negative, depending on the sign of the coupling coefficients.
  
 The formula is finally:  The formula is finally: 
Zeile 486: Zeile 490:
   * the mutual inductances are equal: $M_{12} = M_{21} = M$   * the mutual inductances are equal: $M_{12} = M_{21} = M$
   * the mutual inductance $M$ is:     $M = \sqrt{M_{12}\cdot M_{21}} = k \cdot \sqrt {L_{11}\cdot L_{22}}$   * the mutual inductance $M$ is:     $M = \sqrt{M_{12}\cdot M_{21}} = k \cdot \sqrt {L_{11}\cdot L_{22}}$
-  * The resulting *total coupling* $k$ is given as \begin{align*} k = \rm{sgn}(k_{12}) \sqrt{k_{12}\cdot k_{21}} \end{align*}+  * The resulting **total coupling** $k$ is given as \begin{align*} k = \rm{sgn}(k_{12}) \sqrt{k_{12}\cdot k_{21}} \end{align*}
  
 ==== Effects in the electric Circuits ==== ==== Effects in the electric Circuits ====
Zeile 512: Zeile 516:
 <imgcaption ImgNr12 | Example Circuits with positive Polarity> </imgcaption> {{drawio>posCoupling.svg}} <imgcaption ImgNr12 | Example Circuits with positive Polarity> </imgcaption> {{drawio>posCoupling.svg}}
  
-In this case, the **mutual induction added positively**.+In this case, the **mutual induction is positiv $(M>0)$**.
  
 The formula of the shown circuitry is then:  The formula of the shown circuitry is then: 
Zeile 526: Zeile 530:
 <WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr13 | Example Circuits with negative Polarity> </imgcaption> {{drawio>negCoupling.svg}} </WRAP> <WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr13 | Example Circuits with negative Polarity> </imgcaption> {{drawio>negCoupling.svg}} </WRAP>
  
-In this case, the **mutual induction added negatively**.+In this case, the **mutual induction is negativ $(M<0)$***.
  
 The formula of the shown circuitry is then:  The formula of the shown circuitry is then: 
 \begin{align*}  \begin{align*} 
-u_1 &= R_1 \cdot i_1 &+ L_{11} \cdot {{{\rm d}i_1}\over{{\rm d}t}} &- M \cdot {{{\rm d}i_2}\over{{\rm d}t}} & \\  +u_1 &= R_1 \cdot i_1 &+ L_{11} \cdot {{{\rm d}i_1}\over{{\rm d}t}} & + M \cdot {{{\rm d}i_2}\over{{\rm d}t}} & \\  
-u_2 &= R_2 \cdot i_2 &+ L_{22} \cdot {{{\rm d}i_2}\over{{\rm d}t}} &- M \cdot {{{\rm d}i_1}\over{{\rm d}t}} & \\ +u_2 &= R_2 \cdot i_2 &+ L_{22} \cdot {{{\rm d}i_2}\over{{\rm d}t}} & + M \cdot {{{\rm d}i_1}\over{{\rm d}t}} & \\ 
 \end{align*} \end{align*}