Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
Beide Seiten der vorigen Revision Vorhergehende Überarbeitung Nächste Überarbeitung | Vorhergehende Überarbeitung Nächste Überarbeitung Beide Seiten der Revision | ||
electrical_engineering_2:polyphase_networks [2022/06/17 09:07] tfischer |
electrical_engineering_2:polyphase_networks [2024/06/18 02:20] mexleadmin [Excercises] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
- | ====== 7. Polyphase Networks and Power in AC Circuits ====== | + | ====== 7 Polyphase Networks and Power in AC Circuits ====== |
emphasizing the importance of power considerations | emphasizing the importance of power considerations | ||
- | * three phase four wire systems | + | * three-phase four-wire systems |
- | === 7.0 Recap of complex two-terminal networks === | + | ===== 7.0 Recap of complex two-terminal networks |
- | In the last semester, AC current, AC voltage and their effects have been considered on a circuit that had simply included | + | In the last semester, AC current, AC voltage, and their effects have been considered on a circuit that had simply included |
* the sinusoidal alternating voltage is produced by the rotation of a coil in a homogeneous magnetic field, and | * the sinusoidal alternating voltage is produced by the rotation of a coil in a homogeneous magnetic field, and | ||
Zeile 18: | Zeile 18: | ||
< | < | ||
- | For the rotation angle $\varphi$ holds: \begin{align*} \varphi(t)=\omega t + \varphi_0 \quad \text{with} \quad \varphi_0=\varphi(t=0) \\ \end{align*} | + | For the rotation angle $\varphi$ holds: |
+ | \begin{align*} \varphi(t)=\omega t + \varphi_0 \quad \text{with} \quad \varphi_0=\varphi(t=0) \\ \end{align*} | ||
- | Thus, the induced voltage $u(t)$ is given by: \begin{align*} u(t) &= \frac{d\Psi}{dt} \\ &= N\cdot\frac{d\Phi}{dt} \\ &= NBA\cdot\frac{d cos \varphi(t)}{dt} \\ &= \hat{\Psi}\cdot\frac{d cos (\omega t + \varphi_0)}{dt} \\ & | + | Thus, the induced voltage $u(t)$ is given by: |
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | u(t) & | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | &= \omega \hat{\Psi} | ||
+ | &= \hat{U} | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
- | Such single-phase systems are therefore alternating current systems, which use one outgoing line and one return line each for the current conduction. \\ Out of the last formula we derived the following instantaneous voltage $u(t)$ \begin{align*} u(t) & | + | Such single-phase systems are therefore alternating current systems, which use one outgoing line and one return line each for the current conduction. \\ |
+ | Out of the last formula we derived the following instantaneous voltage $u(t)$ | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | u(t) &= \hat{U} | ||
+ | &= \sqrt{2} U\cdot | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
===== 7.1 Power in AC ===== | ===== 7.1 Power in AC ===== | ||
Zeile 32: | Zeile 46: | ||
By the end of this section, you will be able to: | By the end of this section, you will be able to: | ||
- | - Know the formula of the instantaneous power of the resistor, inductor and capacitor and be able to determine its values. | + | - Know the formula of the instantaneous power of the resistor, inductor, and capacitor and be able to determine its values. |
</ | </ | ||
- | In the first chapter we mainly focussed on the power given by $P = U \cdot I$. This is however only valid for DC circuits. For AC circuits we have to consider the instantaneous power $p(t)$. The instantaneuos | + | In the first chapter, we mainly focussed on the power given by $P = U \cdot I$. This is however only valid for DC circuits. For AC circuits we have to consider the instantaneous power $p(t)$. The instantaneous |
\begin{align*} p(t) &= \color{blue}{u(t)} \cdot \color{red}{i(t)} \end{align*} | \begin{align*} p(t) &= \color{blue}{u(t)} \cdot \color{red}{i(t)} \end{align*} | ||
Zeile 42: | Zeile 56: | ||
==== Ideal Ohmic resistance R ==== | ==== Ideal Ohmic resistance R ==== | ||
- | The simplest component to look at for the instantaneuos | + | The simplest component to look at for the instantaneous |
- | \begin{align*} \color{blue}{u_R(t)} &= \sqrt{2}U sin(\omega t + \varphi_u) \end{align*} | + | \begin{align*} \color{blue}{u_R(t)} &= \sqrt{2}U |
- | With the defining formula for the resistor we get: | + | With the defining formula for the resistor, we get: |
- | \begin{align*} \color{blue}{u_R(t)} &= R \cdot \color{red}{i(t)} \\ \rightarrow \color{red}{i(t)} &= {{\color{blue}{u_R(t)}}\over{R}} \\ &= \sqrt{2} {{U}\over{R}} sin(\omega t + \varphi_u) \end{align*} | + | \begin{align*} |
+ | \color{blue}{u_R(t)} &= R \cdot \color{red}{i(t)} \\ | ||
+ | \rightarrow \color{red}{i(t)} &= {{\color{blue}{u_R(t)}}\over{R}} \\ | ||
+ | | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
This leads to an instantaneous power $p_R(t)$ of | This leads to an instantaneous power $p_R(t)$ of | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | p_R(t) &= \color{blue}{u_R(t)} \cdot \color{red}{i_R(t)} \\ | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
- | \begin{align*} p_R(t) &= \color{blue}{u_R(t)} \cdot \color{red}{i_R(t)} \\ &= 2\cdot {{U^2}\over{R}} sin^2(\omega t + \varphi_u) \\ &= {{U^2}\over{R}}\left(1- cos\left(2\cdot (\omega t + \varphi_u)\right)\right) \\ \end{align*} | + | For the last step the {{https:// |
- | + | ||
- | For the last step the {{https:// | + | |
This result is interesting in the following ways: | This result is interesting in the following ways: | ||
- | - The part $1- cos (2\cdot (\omega t + \varphi_u) )$ is always non-negative and a shifted | + | - The part $1- \cos (2\cdot (\omega t + \varphi_u) )$ is always non-negative and a shifted |
- The average value of $p_R(t)$ is then: $P_R = {{U^2}\over{R}}$ | - The average value of $p_R(t)$ is then: $P_R = {{U^2}\over{R}}$ | ||
- | - The use of the $\sqrt{2}$ in the definition $\color{blue}{u_R(t)} = \sqrt{2} U sin(\omega t + \varphi_u)$ leads to the average power as $P_R = {{U^2}\over{R}}$. This formula for the power is exactly like the formula for the power in pure DC situations. | + | - The use of the $\sqrt{2}$ in the definition $\color{blue}{u_R(t)} = \sqrt{2} U \sin(\omega t + \varphi_u)$ leads to the average power as $P_R = {{U^2}\over{R}}$. This formula for the power is exactly like the formula for the power in pure DC situations. |
==== Ideal Inductivity L ==== | ==== Ideal Inductivity L ==== | ||
- | The similar approach is done for the inductivity. We again start with the basic definition of the instantaneous voltage | + | A similar approach is done for the ideal inductivity. |
+ | We again start with the basic definition of the instantaneous voltage | ||
- | \begin{align*} \color{blue}{u_L(t)} &= \sqrt{2}U sin(\omega t + \varphi_u) \end{align*} | + | \begin{align*} \color{blue}{u_{\rm L}(t)} &= \sqrt{2}U sin(\omega t + \varphi_u) \end{align*} |
- | With the defining formula for the inductivity we get: \begin{align*} \color{blue}{u_L(t)} &= L\cdot {{d\color{red}{i_L(t)}}\over{dt}} \\ \rightarrow \color{red}{i_L(t)} &= {{1}\over{L}} \int \color{blue}{u_L(t)} dt \\ &= - \sqrt{2} {{U}\over{\omega L}} cos(\omega t + \varphi_u) \end{align*} | + | With the defining formula for inductivity, we get: |
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \color{blue}{u_{\rm L}(t)} & | ||
+ | \rightarrow \color{red}{i_{\rm L}(t)} &= {{1}\over{L}} \int \color{blue}{u_{\rm L}(t)} {\rm d}t \\ | ||
+ | | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
This leads to an instantaneous power $p_L(t)$ of | This leads to an instantaneous power $p_L(t)$ of | ||
- | \begin{align*} p_L(t) &= \color{blue}{u(t)} \cdot \color{red}{i(t)} \\ &= - 2\cdot {{U^2}\over{\omega L}} \cdot sin(\omega t + \varphi_u) cos(\omega t + \varphi_u) \\ &= - {{U^2}\over{\omega L}} \cdot sin( 2\cdot (\omega t + \varphi_u)) \\ \end{align*} | + | \begin{align*} |
+ | p_L(t) & | ||
+ | &= - 2\cdot {{U^2}\over{\omega L}} \cdot \sin( \omega t + \varphi_u) | ||
+ | &= - {{U^2}\over{\omega L}} \cdot \sin( 2\cdot (\omega t + \varphi_u)) \\ | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
- | Again a trigonometric identity ({{https:// | + | Again a trigonometric identity ({{https:// |
- | Also this result is interesting: | + | Also, this result is interesting: |
- | - The part $sin( 2\cdot (\omega t + \varphi_u))$ has an average value of $0$. | + | - The part $\sin( 2\cdot (\omega t + \varphi_u))$ has an average value of $0$. |
- Therefore, the average value of $p_L(t)=0$ | - Therefore, the average value of $p_L(t)=0$ | ||
Zeile 85: | Zeile 116: | ||
Also here, we start with the basic definition of the instantaneous voltage | Also here, we start with the basic definition of the instantaneous voltage | ||
- | \begin{align*} \color{blue}{u_C(t)} &= \sqrt{2}U sin(\omega t + \varphi_u) \end{align*} | + | \begin{align*} \color{blue}{u_C(t)} &= \sqrt{2}U |
- | With the defining formula for the capacity we get: \begin{align*} \color{red}{i_C(t)} &= C {{d\color{blue}{u_C(t)}}\over{dt}} \\ &= \sqrt{2} U \omega C cos(\omega t + \varphi_u) \end{align*} | + | With the defining formula for the capacity, we get: |
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \color{red}{i_C(t)} &= C {{{\rm d}\color{blue}{u_C(t)}}\over{{\rm d}t}} \\ | ||
+ | | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
This leads to an instantaneous power $p_C(t)$ of | This leads to an instantaneous power $p_C(t)$ of | ||
- | \begin{align*} p_C(t) &= \color{blue}{u_C(t)} \cdot \color{red}{i_C(t)} \\ &= 2\cdot U^2 \omega C \cdot sin(\omega t + \varphi_u) cos(\omega t + \varphi_u) \\ &= + U^2 \omega C \cdot sin( 2\cdot (\omega t + \varphi_u)) \\ \end{align*} | + | \begin{align*} |
+ | p_C(t) &= \color{blue}{u_C(t)} \cdot \color{red}{i_C(t)} \\ | ||
+ | &= 2\cdot U^2 \omega C \cdot \sin( | ||
+ | &= + U^2 \omega C \cdot \sin( 2\cdot (\omega t + \varphi_u)) \\ | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
Again this result leads to: | Again this result leads to: | ||
- | - The part $sin( 2\cdot (\omega t + \varphi_u))$ has an average value of $0$. | + | - The part $\sin( 2\cdot (\omega t + \varphi_u))$ has an average value of $0$. |
- Therefore, also the average value of $p_C(t)=0$ | - Therefore, also the average value of $p_C(t)=0$ | ||
- | * Instantaneuos | + | * Instantaneous |
* Active, reactive, apparent, and complex power | * Active, reactive, apparent, and complex power | ||
- | This effect can also be seen in the following simulation: The simulation shows three loads, all with an impedance of $|Z| = 1 k\Omega$. The diagram on top of each circuit shows the instantaneous **<fc # | + | This effect can also be seen in the following simulation: The simulation shows three loads, all with an impedance of $|Z| = 1 ~\rm k\Omega$. |
+ | The diagram on top of each circuit shows the instantaneous **<fc # | ||
- | - Ohmic load: The instantaneous voltage is in phase with the instantaneous current. The instantaneous power is always non negative. The average power is $P=U^2/R = {{1}\over{2}} \hat{U}^2/ | + | - Ohmic load: The instantaneous voltage is in phase with the instantaneous current. The instantaneous power is always non-negative. The average power is $P=U^2/R = {{1}\over{2}} \hat{U}^2/ |
- | - Inductive load: The voltage is ahead of the current. The phase angle is $+90°$ (which also reflects the $+j$ in the inductive impedance $+j\omega L$). The instantaneous is half positive, half negative; the average power is zero (in the simulation not completely visible). | + | - Inductive load: The voltage is ahead of the current. The phase angle is $+90°$ (which also reflects the $+{\rm j}$ in the inductive impedance $+{\rm j}\omega L$). The instantaneous is half positive, half negative; the average power is zero (in the simulation not completely visible). |
- | - Capacitive load: The voltage is lagging the current. The phase angle is $-90°$ (which also reflects the $-j$ in the capacitive impedance ${{1}\over{j\omega C}}$). The instantaneous is again half positive, half negative; the average power is zero (in the simulation not completely visible). | + | - Capacitive load: The voltage is lagging the current. The phase angle is $-90°$ (which also reflects the $-{\rm j}$ in the capacitive impedance ${{1}\over{{\rm j}\omega C}}$). The instantaneous is again half positive, half negative; the average power is zero (in the simulation not completely visible). |
< | < | ||
Zeile 111: | Zeile 151: | ||
==== arbitrary two-terminal Component ==== | ==== arbitrary two-terminal Component ==== | ||
- | For an arbitrary component we do not have any defining formula. But, the $u(t)$ and $i(t)$ can generally be defined as: | + | For an arbitrary component, we do not have any defining formula. But, the $u(t)$ and $i(t)$ can generally be defined as: |
- | \begin{align*} \color{blue}{u(t)} &= \sqrt{2}U sin(\omega t + \varphi_u) \\ \color{red }{i(t)} &= \sqrt{2}I sin(\omega t + \varphi_i) \\ \end{align*} | + | \begin{align*} |
+ | \color{blue}{u(t)} &= \sqrt{2}U | ||
+ | \color{red }{i(t)} &= \sqrt{2}I | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
This leads to an instantaneous power $p(t)$ of | This leads to an instantaneous power $p(t)$ of | ||
- | \begin{align*} p(t) &= \color{blue}{u(t)} \cdot \color{red}{i(t)} \\ &= 2\cdot UI sin(\omega t + \varphi_u) sin(\omega t + \varphi_i) \\ \end{align*} | + | \begin{align*} |
+ | p(t) &= \color{blue}{u(t)} \cdot \color{red}{i(t)} \\ | ||
+ | &= 2\cdot UI \sin(\omega t + \varphi_u) | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
The formula can be further simplified with the help of the following equations | The formula can be further simplified with the help of the following equations | ||
* $\varphi = \varphi_u - \varphi_i \quad \rightarrow \varphi_i = \varphi_u - \varphi$ | * $\varphi = \varphi_u - \varphi_i \quad \rightarrow \varphi_i = \varphi_u - \varphi$ | ||
- | * $sin(\Box - \varphi) = sin(\Box) cos \varphi - cos(\Box) sin \varphi $ | + | * $ \sin(\Box - \varphi) = \sin(\Box) |
- | * $2sin\Box sin\Box = 1 - cos(2\Box)$ | + | * $2\sin\Box \sin\Box = 1 - \cos(2\Box)$ |
- | * $2sin\Box cos\Box = sin(2\Box)$ | + | * $2\sin\Box \cos\Box = \sin(2\Box)$ |
- | \begin{align*} p(t) = UI\big( cos\varphi \left( 1- cos(2(\omega t + \varphi_u)\right) - sin\varphi \cdot sin(2(\omega t + \varphi_u) \big) \\ \end{align*} | + | \begin{align*} |
+ | p(t) = UI\big( | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
This result is twofold: | This result is twofold: | ||
- | - The part $ cos\varphi \; \cdot \; \left( 1- cos(2(\omega t + \varphi_u)\right)$ results into a non-zero average - explicitly this part is $1$ in average. On average the first part of the formula | + | - The part $ \cos\varphi \; \cdot \; \left( 1- \cos(2(\omega t + \varphi_u)\right)$ results into a non-zero average - explicitly this part is $1$ in average. On average the first part of the formula |
- | - The part $- sin\varphi \; \cdot \; sin(2(\omega t + \varphi_u))$ is zero in average, so the second part of the formula | + | - The part $- \sin\varphi \; \cdot \; \sin(2(\omega t + \varphi_u))$ is zero on average, so the second part of the formula |
<callout icon=" | <callout icon=" | ||
Zeile 137: | Zeile 185: | ||
A distinction is now made between: | A distinction is now made between: | ||
- | * An **active power** | + | * An **active power** |
* The active power represents a pulsed energy drain out of the electrical system (commonly by an ohmic resistor). | * The active power represents a pulsed energy drain out of the electrical system (commonly by an ohmic resistor). | ||
- | * The active power transform | + | * The active power transforms |
- | * Therefore the unit of the active power is $Watt$. | + | * Therefore, the unit of the active power is $\rm Watt$. |
- | * A **reactive power** | + | * A **reactive power** |
* The reactive power describes the " | * The reactive power describes the " | ||
- | * The reactive power is completely regained by the electic | + | * The reactive power is completely regained by the electric |
- | * In order to distinguish the values, the unit of the reactive power is $V\!\! Ar$ (or $Var$) for **__V__** | + | * To distinguish the values, the unit of the reactive power is $\rm VAr$ (or $\rm Var$) for **__V__** |
- | * An **apparent power** | + | * An **apparent power** |
* The apparent power is the simple multiplication of the RMS values from the current and the voltage. | * The apparent power is the simple multiplication of the RMS values from the current and the voltage. | ||
- | * The apparent power shows only what seem to be a value of power, but can deviate from usable power, when indoctors aor capacitors are used in the circuit. | + | * The apparent power shows only what seems to be a value of power, but can deviate from usable power when inductors or capacitors are used in the circuit. |
- | * The unit of the apparent power is $V\!\! A$ for **__V__** | + | * The unit of the apparent power is $\rm VA$ for **__V__**olt**__a__**mpere |
- | Similarly, the currents and voltages can be separated into active, reactive and apparent values. </ | + | Similarly, the currents and voltages can be separated into active, reactive, and apparent values. </ |
- | Based on the given formulas the three types of power are connected with each other. Since the apparent power are given by $S=U\cdot I$, the active power $P = U\cdot I \cdot sin \varphi = S \cdot sin \varphi $ and the reactive power $Q = S \cdot cos \varphi $, the relationship can be shown in a triangle (see <imgref imageNo02> | + | Based on the given formulas the three types of power are connected with each other. Since the apparent power is given by $S=U\cdot I$, the active power $P = U\cdot I \cdot \cos \varphi = S \cdot \cos \varphi $ and the reactive power $Q = S \cdot \sin \varphi $, the relationship can be shown in a triangle (see <imgref imageNo02> |
< | < | ||
Zeile 158: | Zeile 206: | ||
Generally, the apparent power can also be interpreted as a complex value: | Generally, the apparent power can also be interpreted as a complex value: | ||
- | \begin{align*} \underline{S} &= S \cdot e^{j\varphi} \\ &= U \cdot I \cdot e^{j\varphi} \end{align*} | + | \begin{align*} |
+ | \underline{S} &= S | ||
+ | | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
Based on the definition of the phase angle $\varphi = \varphi_U - \varphi_I$, this can be divided into: | Based on the definition of the phase angle $\varphi = \varphi_U - \varphi_I$, this can be divided into: | ||
- | \begin{align*} \underline{S} &= U \cdot I \cdot e^{j(\varphi_U - \varphi_I)} \\ &= \underbrace{U \cdot e^{j\varphi_U}}_{\underline{U}} \cdot \underbrace{I \cdot e^{-j\varphi_I}}_{\underline{I}^*} \end{align*} | + | \begin{align*} |
+ | \underline{S} & | ||
+ | | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
where $\underline{I}^*$ is the complex conjungated value of $\underline{I}$. | where $\underline{I}^*$ is the complex conjungated value of $\underline{I}$. | ||
Zeile 168: | Zeile 222: | ||
<callout icon=" | <callout icon=" | ||
- | * $\underline{S} = UI \cdot e^{j\varphi}$ | + | * $\underline{S} = UI \cdot {\rm e}^{{\rm j}\varphi}$ |
- | * $\underline{S} = UI \cdot (cos\varphi + j sin\varphi)$ | + | * $\underline{S} = UI \cdot (\cos\varphi + {\rm j} \sin\varphi)$ |
- | * $\underline{S} = P + jQ$ | + | * $\underline{S} = P + {\rm j}Q$ |
* $\underline{S} = \underline{U} \cdot \underline{I}^*$ | * $\underline{S} = \underline{U} \cdot \underline{I}^*$ | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | The following simulation shows three ohmic-inductive loads, all with an impedance of $|Z| = 1 k\Omega$, however with different phase angles $\varphi$. The diagram on top of each circuit shows the instantaneous **<fc # | + | The following simulation shows three ohmic-inductive loads, all with an impedance of $|Z| = 1 ~\rm k\Omega$, however with different phase angles $\varphi$. |
+ | The diagram on top of each circuit shows the instantaneous **<fc # | ||
+ | Similar to the last simulation, a pure ohmic resistance would consume an average power of $P=U^2/R = {{1}\over{2}} \hat{U}^2/ | ||
+ | The three diagrams shall be discussed | ||
- | - Phase angle $\varphi = 10°$: Nearly all of the impedance | + | - Phase angle $\varphi = 10°$: Nearly all of the impedance |
- | - Phase angle $\varphi = 60°$: It is clearly visible, that instantaneous voltage and current are out of phase. The instantaneous power is often lower than zero. The ohmic resistor has $500\Omega = {{1}\over{2}}|Z|$, | + | - Phase angle $\varphi = 60°$: It is clearly visible, that instantaneous voltage and current are out of phase. The instantaneous power is often lower than zero. The ohmic resistor has $500 ~\rm \Omega = {{1}\over{2}}|Z|$, |
- | - Phase angle $\varphi = 84.28°$: The phase angle is calculated in such a way, that the resistance is only 10% of the amplitude of the impedance $|Z|$. In this case load is nearly pure inductive. The instantaneous power is consequently almost half of the time lower than zero. The average power here also only $10%$ of the power for an pure ohmic impedance. | + | - Phase angle $\varphi = 84.28°$: The phase angle is calculated in such a way, that the resistance is only 10% of the amplitude of the impedance $|Z|$. In this case, the load is nearly pure inductive. The instantaneous power is consequently almost half of the time lower than zero. The average power here is also only $10%$ of the power for a pure ohmic impedance. |
< | < | ||
- | The next simulation enables to play around with the phase angle of an impedance. The circuit on the left side is a bit harder to understand, but consist | + | The next simulation enables |
+ | The circuit on the left side is a bit harder to understand but consists | ||
+ | All of these components are parameterizable in such a way that the phase angle can be manipulated by the slider on the right side. \\ In the middle part reflects the time course of: | ||
* The instantaneous power $p$ of the **<fc # | * The instantaneous power $p$ of the **<fc # | ||
* The instantaneous **<fc # | * The instantaneous **<fc # | ||
- | On the right-hand side the impedance Phasor is shown (lower diagram). The upper diagram depicts the $u$-$i$-diagram, | + | On the right-hand side, the impedance Phasor is shown (lower diagram). The upper diagram depicts the $u$-$i$-diagram, |
- | The folllowing | + | The following |
- How does the amplitude of the active and reactive instantaneous power change, when the phase angle is changed between $-90°...+90°$? | - How does the amplitude of the active and reactive instantaneous power change, when the phase angle is changed between $-90°...+90°$? | ||
- What is the phase shift between the active and reactive instantaneous power? | - What is the phase shift between the active and reactive instantaneous power? | ||
- | < | + | < |
+ | [[http:// | ||
+ | )) | ||
- | Also the last simulation shows the relation between the phase angle (here: $\alpha$) and instantaneous values, like power, voltage and current. | + | Also, the last simulation shows the relation between the phase angle (here: $\alpha$) and instantaneous values, like power, voltage, and current. |
< | < | ||
Zeile 207: | Zeile 268: | ||
=== Power Factor Correction === | === Power Factor Correction === | ||
- | Cables and components have to conduct the sum of active and reactive | + | Cables and components have to conduct the sum of active and reactive |
<callout icon=" | <callout icon=" | ||
- | \begin{align*} pf &= cos \varphi \\ &= {{P}\over{|\underline{S}|}} \end{align*} | + | \begin{align*} pf & |
The power factor shows how much real power one gets out of the needed apparent power. </ | The power factor shows how much real power one gets out of the needed apparent power. </ | ||
- | How does the power factor show the problematic effects? For this one can investigate situation of a ohmic-inductive load $\underline{Z}_L$ which is connected to a voltage $\underline{U}_0$ source with a wire $R_{wire}$. This circuit is shown in <imgref imageNo03> | + | How does the power factor show the problematic effects? For this one can investigate |
< | < | ||
- | The usable output power is $P_L = U_L \cdot I \cdot cos \varphi$. Based on this, the current $\underline{I}$ is: | + | The usable output power is $P_L = U_{\rm L} \cdot I \cdot \cos \varphi$. Based on this, the current $\underline{I}$ is: |
- | \begin{align*} I = {{P_L}\over{U_L \cdot cos \varphi}} \end{align*} | + | \begin{align*} I = {{P_L}\over{U_{\rm L} \cdot \cos \varphi}} \end{align*} |
The power loss of the wire $P_{wire}$ is therefore: | The power loss of the wire $P_{wire}$ is therefore: | ||
- | \begin{align*} P_{wire} &= R_{wire} \cdot I^2 \\ &= R_{wire} \cdot {{P_L^2}\over{U_L^2 \cdot cos^2 \varphi}} \end{align*} | + | \begin{align*} |
+ | P_{\rm wire} &= R_{\rm wire} \cdot I^2 \\ | ||
+ | &= R_{\rm wire} \cdot {{P_L^2}\over{U_{\rm L}^2 \cdot \cos^2 \varphi}} | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
- | This means: As smaller the power factor $cos \varphi$, as more power losses $P_{wire}$ will be generated. More power losses $P_{wire}$ | + | This means: As smaller, the power factor $\cos \varphi$, as more power losses $P_{\rm wire}$ will be generated. More power losses $P_{\rm wire}$ |
- | Alternatively, | + | Alternatively, |
< | < | ||
- | Another explanation of power factor can be seen here: | + | Another explanation of the power factor can be seen here: |
{{youtube> | {{youtube> | ||
Zeile 243: | Zeile 307: | ||
===== 7.2 Polyphase Networks ===== | ===== 7.2 Polyphase Networks ===== | ||
- | In order to transfer power over long distances alternating current | + | To transfer power over long distances alternating current |
- | < | + | < |
- | In the following, the way to polyphase networks and explicitely | + | In the following, the way to polyphase networks and explicitly |
==== 7.2.1 Technical terms of the Polyphase Networks ==== | ==== 7.2.1 Technical terms of the Polyphase Networks ==== | ||
Zeile 255: | Zeile 319: | ||
Various general technical terms in the polyphase system (in German: Mehrphasensystem) will now be briefly discussed. | Various general technical terms in the polyphase system (in German: Mehrphasensystem) will now be briefly discussed. | ||
- | - A **$m$-phase system** | + | - A **$m$-phase system** |
- | - An $m$-phase system is **symmetrical** | + | The voltages are generated by a homogenous magnetic field containing $m$ rotating windings, which are arranged with a fixed offset to each other (see <imgref imageNo04> |
- | - The windings can be concatenated (=linked) in different ways. The most importend | + | < |
- | - All windings are independently connected to a load. This phase system is called **non-interlinked** | + | </ |
- | - All windings are connected to each other, then the phase system is called **interlinked**. \\ \\ <WRAP outdent> | + | - An $m$-phase system is **symmetrical** |
+ | Thus, the voltage phasors $\underline{U}_1 ... \underline{U}_m$ form a symmetrical star. \\ | ||
+ | Example: A 3-phase system is symmetrical for $\varphi = 360°/3 = 120°$ | ||
+ | $\underline{U}_1 = \sqrt{2} \cdot U \cdot {\rm e} ^{{\rm j}(\omega t + 0°)}$, | ||
+ | $\underline{U}_2 = \sqrt{2} \cdot U \cdot {\rm e} ^{{\rm j}(\omega t - 120°)}$, | ||
+ | $\underline{U}_3 = \sqrt{2} \cdot U \cdot {\rm e} ^{{\rm j}(\omega t - 240°)}$ \\ | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | - The windings can be concatenated (=linked) in different ways. The most important | ||
+ | - All windings are independently connected to a load. This phase system is called **non-interlinked** | ||
+ | - All windings are connected to each other, then the phase system is called **interlinked**. | ||
+ | With interlinking, | ||
+ | The two simulations in <imgref pic20> show a non-interlinked and an interlinked circuit with generator and load in star shape.</ | ||
+ | < | ||
- | </ | + | </ |
- | - The instantaneous power $p_i(t)$ of a winding $i$ is variable in time. For the instantaneous power $p(t)$ of the $m$-phase system one has to consider all single instantaneous powers of the windings. When this instantaneous power $p(t)$ does not change with time, the polyphase system is called **balanced**. | + | - The instantaneous power $p_i(t)$ of a winding $i$ is variable in time. For the instantaneous power $p(t)$ of the $m$-phase system one has to consider all single instantaneous powers of the windings. When this instantaneous power $p(t)$ does not change with time, the polyphase system is called **balanced**. |
+ | If a balanced load is used, then polyphase systems are balanced with $m\geq3$. \\ \\ | ||
+ | For $m\geq3$ and symmetrical load, the following is obtained for the instantaneous power: \\ \\ | ||
+ | $\quad \quad p = m \cdot U \cdot I \cdot \cos\varphi = P$ \\ | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | </ | ||
- | + | The following simulation shows the power in the different phases of a symmetrical and balanced system. The instantaneous power of each phase is a non-negative | |
- | The following simulation shows the power in the different phases of a symmetrical and balanced system. The instantaneous power of each phase is a non-negative | + | |
< | < | ||
Balanced polyphase networks have the lowest wiring costs. | Balanced polyphase networks have the lowest wiring costs. | ||
- | Polyphase networks are also possible in ring interlinking (also called ring connection, see next simulation). | + | The structure of a polyphase network can also represent a ring interlinking (also called ring connection, see next simulation). |
- | The often used (and also here used) term of three-phase current or alternating current | + | The often used (and also here used) term of three-phase current or alternating current |
< | < | ||
Zeile 281: | Zeile 362: | ||
==== 7.2.2 Three-Phase System ==== | ==== 7.2.2 Three-Phase System ==== | ||
- | The most commonly used polyphase system is the three-phase system. The three-phase system has advantages over a DC system or single phase AC system: | + | See also: [[https:// |
+ | |||
+ | The most commonly used polyphase system is the three-phase system. The three-phase system has advantages over a DC system or single-phase AC system: | ||
* Simple three-phase machines can be used for generation. | * Simple three-phase machines can be used for generation. | ||
- | * Rotary field machines (e.g. synchronous motors or induction motors) can also be simply connected to as load, converting the electrical energy into mechanical energy. | + | * Rotary field machines (e.g. synchronous motors or induction motors) can also be simply connected to a load, converting the electrical energy into mechanical energy. |
* When a symmetrical load can be assumed, the energy flow is constant in time. | * When a symmetrical load can be assumed, the energy flow is constant in time. | ||
* For energy transport, the voltage can be up-transformed and thus the AC current, as well as the associated power loss (= waste heat), can be reduced. | * For energy transport, the voltage can be up-transformed and thus the AC current, as well as the associated power loss (= waste heat), can be reduced. | ||
- | In order to understand the three-phase system, we have to investigate the different voltages and currents in this system. | + | To understand the three-phase system, we have to investigate the different voltages and currents in this system. |
For this the three-phase system will be separated into three parts: | For this the three-phase system will be separated into three parts: | ||
Zeile 296: | Zeile 379: | ||
- Loads | - Loads | ||
- | < | + | < |
=== Three-phase generator === | === Three-phase generator === | ||
- | * The windings of a three-phase generator are called $U$, $V$, $W$; the winding connections are correspondingly called: $U1$, $U2$, $V1$, $V2$, $W1$, $W2$ (see <imgref imageNo10> | + | * The windings of a three-phase generator are called $\rm U$, $\rm V$, $\rm W$; the winding connections are correspondingly called: $\rm U1$, $\rm U2$, $\rm V1$, $\rm V2$, $\rm W1$, $\rm W2$ (see <imgref imageNo10> |
- | * The typical **winding connections** | + | < |
- | * The **phase voltages** | + | * The typical **winding connections** |
+ | < | ||
+ | * The **phase voltages** | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \color{RoyalBlue }{u_{\rm U}} & \color{RoyalBlue }{= \sqrt{2} U \cdot \cos(\omega t + \alpha - 0 | ||
+ | \color{Green | ||
+ | \color{DarkOrchid}{u_{\rm W}} & \color{DarkOrchid}{= \sqrt{2} U \cdot \cos(\omega t + \alpha - {{4}\over{3}}\pi)} \\ | ||
+ | \color{RoyalBlue }{u_{\rm U}} + \color{Green}{u_{\rm V}} + \color{DarkOrchid}{u_{\rm W}} & = 0 \end{align*}</ | ||
* The **direction of rotation** | * The **direction of rotation** | ||
- | * The three-phase generator with clockwise direction (CW, mathematically negative orientation) shows the phase sequence: $u_U$, $u_V$, $u_W$, Therefore, $u_V$ is $120°$ lagging to $u_U$. \\ This is the common setup for generators. | + | * The three-phase generator with clockwise direction (CW, mathematically negative orientation) shows the phase sequence: $u_{\rm U}$, $u_{\rm V}$, $u_{\rm W}$, Therefore, $u_{\rm V}$ is $120°$ lagging to $u_{\rm U}$. \\ This is the common setup for generators. |
- | * The three-phase generator with counter-clockwise direction (CCW, mathematically positive orientation) shows the phase sequence: $u_U$, $u_W$, $u_V$, Therefore, $u_V$ is $120°$ ahead of $u_U$. | + | * The three-phase generator with counter-clockwise direction (CCW, mathematically positive orientation) shows the phase sequence: $u_{\rm U}$, $u_{\rm W}$, $u_{\rm V}$, Therefore, $u_{\rm V}$ is $120°$ ahead of $u_{\rm U}$. |
- | * The direction can be changed simply by switching two of the three phases (it does not need to be $u_V$ with $u_W$!). \\ < | + | * The direction can be changed simply by switching two of the three phases (it does not need to be $u_{\rm V}$ with $u_{\rm W}$!). \\ < |
=== Line Conductors === | === Line Conductors === | ||
- | The lines connected to the generator / load terminals $U1$, $V1$, $W1$ are often called $L1$, $L2$, $L3$ ($L$ for **l**ine) outside of the generator or load. \\ It is important to distinguish between the different types of voltages and currents, which depent | + | The lines connected to the generator / load terminals $\rm U1$, $\rm V1$, $\rm W1$ are often called $\rm L1$, $\rm L2$, $\rm L3$ ($\rm L$ for **L**ine or **L**ive = active) outside of the generator or load. \\ It is important to distinguish between the different types of voltages and currents, which depend |
- | * **String voltages/ | + | * **String voltages/ |
- | * **Phase voltages/ | + | The string voltages/ |
- | * **Star | + | These voltages are shown in the previous images as $u_\rm U$, $u_\rm V$, and $u_\rm W$. |
- | < | + | </ |
+ | * **Phase voltages/ | ||
+ | The phase voltages are measured differentially between the lines. The phase voltages are therefore given as $U_{12}$, $U_{23}$, $U_{31}$. \\ | ||
+ | The phase currents are given as the currents through a single line: $I_1$, $I_2$, $I_3$. \\ | ||
+ | The potential of the star point is called **neutral** $\rm N$ </ | ||
+ | * **Star | ||
+ | < | ||
- | The setup with $L1$, $L2$, $L3$ and $N$ is called **three-phase four-wire system**. When only a Delta connection without neutral is connected it is called a **three-phase three-wire system**. The star and phase voltages are given by | + | The setup with $\rm L1$, $\rm L2$, $\rm L3$ and $\rm N$ is called **three-phase four-wire system**. When only a Delta connection without neutral is connected it is called a **three-phase three-wire system**. The star and phase voltages are given by |
- | {{drawio> | + | {{drawio> |
- | A phasor diagram can be constructed based on the given voltages. Be aware, that commonly the phasor is shown as vector (i.e. as an arrow starting from the origin or zero). In contrast to this, the voltage in a circuit is shown as a arrow pointing towards the zero potential. | + | A phasor diagram can be constructed based on the given voltages. Be aware, that commonly the phasor is shown as a vector (i.e. as an arrow starting from the origin or zero). In contrast to this, the voltage in a circuit is shown as an arrow pointing towards the zero potential. |
- | < | + | < |
For the yellow triangle in <imgref imageNo14> | For the yellow triangle in <imgref imageNo14> | ||
- | \begin{align*} {{1}\over{2}} U_{31} &= U_{1N} \cdot cos 30° \\ &= U_{1N} \cdot {{\sqrt{3}}\over{2}} \\ \\ U_{31} &= \sqrt{3} \cdot U_{1N} \\ U_{L} &= \sqrt{3} \cdot U_{S} \\ \end{align*} | + | \begin{align*} |
+ | {{1}\over{2}} U_{31} &= U_{\rm 1N} | ||
+ | &= U_{\rm 1N} | ||
+ | | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | \begin{align*} \boxed{U_{L} = \sqrt{3} \cdot U_\rm Y } \end{align*} | ||
- | The phase voltages are $\sqrt{3}$ larger than the star voltage. In Europe the low-voltage network of electric power distribution is defined by the RMS value of a star voltage of $400V$. The phase voltage is therefore ${{1}\over{\sqrt{3}}} \cdot 400V \approx | + | The phase voltages are $\sqrt{3}$ larger than the star-voltage. In Europe, the low-voltage network of electric power distribution is defined by the RMS value of a star-voltage of $400~\rm V$. \\ |
+ | The phase voltage is therefore ${{1}\over{\sqrt{3}}} \cdot 400~\rm V \approx | ||
- | < | + | < |
- | <WRAP > | + | <WRAP > |
- | ==== 7.2.3 Power in Three-Phase Systems ==== | + | ==== 7.2.3 Load and Power in Three-Phase Systems ==== |
- | In order to understand the load in three-phase systems, the power at different types of loads are investigated: | + | < |
- | | + | To understand the load in three-phase systems, the power at different types of loads will be investigated: |
- | * Load in Wye connection with three-phase three-wire system | + | |
+ | | ||
+ | * Load in Wye connection with the three-phase three-wire system | ||
* Load in Delta connection | * Load in Delta connection | ||
An example circuit is chosen for each investigation. | An example circuit is chosen for each investigation. | ||
- | \\ | + | |
+ | \\ \\ | ||
=== Load in Wye connection (Four-Wire System) === | === Load in Wye connection (Four-Wire System) === | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The four-wire wiring is one of the most common ways to connect three-phase systems. The {{wp>IEC 60309}} connector (in German commonly known as //CEE Stecker//) is often used for this connection. The connector has an additional pin $\rm PE$, besides the explained phases $\rm L1$, $\rm L2$, $\rm L3$, and the neutral line $\rm N$. **PE** stand for protective earth and is part of the {{wp> | ||
+ | |||
+ | For the four-wire system, the four pins $\rm L1$, $\rm L2$, $\rm L3$, and the neutral line $\rm N$ are used for power transfer. | ||
+ | This is for example applied for loads in a star configuration, | ||
<panel type=" | <panel type=" | ||
- | In an three-phase four-wire system | + | The example in the following |
- | The following | + | |
- | The goal is to calculate | + | * Calculate |
+ | * Calculate | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | < | + | < |
- | <callout title=" | + | <callout title=" |
\\ | \\ | ||
- | | + | The following " |
- | - **Currents**: | + | |
- | - The **true power** $P_x$ for each string is given by the apparent power $S_x$ times the indivitual | + | |
- | - For the **apparent power** one could think of $S_x$ for each string is given by the string voltage and the current through the string $S_x = U_S \cdot I_x$. However this misses out the apparent power of the neutral line! \\ Even when considering all four lines a simple addition of all the apparent powers per phase would be problematic: | + | - **Currents**: |
- | - Given the collective apparent power the **collective reactive power** $Q_\Sigma$ ist given by \\ \begin{align*} Q_\Sigma = \sqrt{S_\Sigma^2-P^2} \end{align*} | + | The phase currents are given by the phase impedances and the star-voltages: \\ |
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{I}_1 = {{\underline{U}_{1 \rm N}}\over{\underline{Z}_1^\phantom{O}}} \quad , \quad | ||
+ | \underline{I}_2 = {{\underline{U}_{2 \rm N}}\over{\underline{Z}_2^\phantom{O}}} \quad , \quad | ||
+ | \underline{I}_3 = {{\underline{U}_{3 \rm N}}\over{\underline{Z}_3^\phantom{O}}} \\ \end{align*}</ | ||
+ | - The **true power** $P_x$ for each string is given by the apparent power $S_x$ of the string | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | Therefore, the resulting true power for the full load is: \\ | ||
+ | \begin{align*} P = U_{\rm S} \cdot ( I_1 \cdot \cos \varphi_1 + I_2 \cdot \cos \varphi_2 + I_3 \cdot \cos \varphi_3) \end{align*} \\ | ||
+ | The angle $\varphi$ here is given by $\varphi = \varphi_u - \varphi_i$, and hence: \\ | ||
+ | \begin{align*} P = U_{\rm S} \cdot \left( I_1 \cdot \cos (\varphi_{u, | ||
+ | - For the **apparent power** one could think of $S_x$ for each string is given by the string voltage and the current through the string $S_x = U_{\rm S} \cdot I_x$. However, this misses out on the apparent power of the neutral line! < | ||
+ | Even when considering all four lines a simple addition of all the apparent powers per phase would be problematic: | ||
+ | By DIN 40110 the **collective apparent power ** $S_\Sigma$ can be assumed as \\ | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | S_\Sigma &= \sqrt{\sum_x U_{x \rm N}^2+ \underbrace{U_{\rm N}^2}_{=0}} &\cdot & \sqrt{\sum_x I_{x}^2+ | ||
+ | &= \sqrt{3} \cdot U_{\rm S} & \cdot & \sqrt{I_1^2 + I_2^2 + I_2^3 + I_{\rm N}^2} \\ \end{align*}</ | ||
+ | - Given the collective apparent power the **collective reactive power** $Q_\Sigma$ ist given by \\ \begin{align*} | ||
</ | </ | ||
<panel type=" | <panel type=" | ||
- | In the example this leads to: | + | In the example, this leads to: |
- | - The star voltages and the phase voltages are given as \begin{align*} | + | - The star-voltages and the phase voltages are given as < |
- | - Based on the star voltages and the given impedances the phase currents are: \\ \begin{align*} \underline{I}_1 &= {{\underline{U}_{1N}}\over{\underline{Z}_1}} &= &{{231V}\over{10\Omega + j \cdot 2\pi\cdot | + | \begin{align*} |
- | - The true power is calculated by: \\ \begin{align*} P = 231V \cdot \big( 23.08 A \cdot cos (0° - (-1.8°))+ 7.17A \cdot cos (-120° - (-38.9°)) + 11.55 A \cdot cos (-240° - (-240°)\big) = 8.26 kW \end{align*} | + | U_{\rm S}=& |
- | - The collective apparent power is: \\ \begin{align*} S_\Sigma & | + | U_{\rm L}=\sqrt{3} \cdot 231 ~\rm V = & 400 ~\rm V = U_{12} = U_{23} = U_{31} |
- | - The collective reactive power is: \\ \begin{align*} Q_\Sigma & | + | \end{align*} \\ |
+ | The phasors of the star-voltages are given as: \\ {{drawio> | ||
+ | - Based on the star-voltages and the given impedances the phase currents are: < | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{I}_1 &= {{\underline{U}_{\rm 1N}}\over{\underline{Z}_1}} | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | \underline{I}_2 &= {{\underline{U}_{\rm 2N}}\over{\underline{Z}_2}} | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | \underline{I}_3 &= {{\underline{U}_{\rm 3N}}\over{\underline{Z}_3}} | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | \underline{I}_{\rm N} | ||
+ | | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | - The true power is calculated by: < | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | P = 231 {~\rm V} \cdot \big( 23.09 {~\rm A} \cdot \cos (0° - (-1.8°))+ 7.17 {~\rm A} \cdot \cos (-120° - (-38.9°)) + 11.55 {~\rm A} \cdot \cos (-240° - (-240°)\big) | ||
+ | | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | - The collective apparent power is: < | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | S_\Sigma & | ||
+ | | ||
+ | \end{align*}</ | ||
+ | - The collective reactive power is: < | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | Q_\Sigma & | ||
+ | | ||
+ | \end{align*}</ | ||
- | < | + | < |
</ | </ | ||
- | <callout title=" | + | <callout title=" |
\\ | \\ | ||
- | In case of an symmetric load the situation and the formulas get much simplier: | + | In the case of a symmetric load, the situation and the formulas get much simpler: |
- | - The **phase voltages** $U_L$ and star voltages $U_S$ are equal to the asymmetric load: $U_L = \sqrt{3}\cdot | + | - The **phase-voltages** $U_\rm L$ and star-voltages $U_{\rm Y} = U_{\rm S}$ are related by: $U_{\rm L} = \sqrt{3}\cdot |
- | - For equal impedances the absolute value of all **phase currents** $I_x$ are the same: $|\underline{I}_x|= |\underline{I}_S| = {{\underline{U}_S}\over{\underline{Z}_S}}$. Since the phase currents the same absolute value and have the same $\varphi$, they will add up to zero. Therefore there is no current on neutral line: $I_N =0$ | + | - For equal impedances the absolute value of all **phase currents** $I_x$ are the same: $|\underline{I}_x|= |\underline{I}_{\rm S}| = \left|{{\underline{U}_{\rm S}}\over{\underline{Z}_{\rm S}^\phantom{O}}} \right|$. \\ Since the phase currents |
- | - The **true power** is three times the true power of a single phase: $P = 3 \cdot U_S I_S \cdot cos \varphi$. Based on the line voltages $U_L$, the formula is $P = \sqrt{3} \cdot U_S I_S \cdot cos \varphi$ | + | - The **true power** is three times the true power of a single phase: $P = 3 \cdot U_{\rm S} I_{\rm S} \cdot \cos \varphi$. |
- | - The **(collective) apparent power** - given the formula above - is: $S_\Sigma = \sqrt{3}\cdot | + | - The **(collective) apparent power** - given the formula above - is: $S_\Sigma = \sqrt{3}\cdot |
- | - The **reactive power** leads to: $Q_\Sigma = \sqrt{S_\Sigma^2 - P^2} = 3 \cdot U_S I_S \cdot sin (\varphi)$. | + | - The **reactive power** leads to: $Q_\Sigma = \sqrt{S_\Sigma^2 - P^2} = 3 \cdot U_{\rm S} I_{\rm S} \cdot \sin \varphi$. |
</ | </ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
=== Load in Wye connection with (Three-Wire System) === | === Load in Wye connection with (Three-Wire System) === | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | The three-wire system is used the four pins $\rm L1$, $\rm L2$, $\rm L3$, and the neutral line $\rm N$ is used for power transfer. | ||
+ | Sometimes the load does not provide a neutral connection, even when it is in a Wye connection - the star point can for example only be provided for measurement with a thin cable. | ||
+ | Additionally, | ||
+ | In the case of a three-wire system, only the potentials $\rm L1$, $\rm L2$, and $\rm L3$ are provided and used for power transfer. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <panel type=" | ||
+ | The example in the following simulation shows a $50 ~\rm Hz$ / $231 ~\rm V$ three-phase __three-wire system__ with an unbalanced load in the Wye connection, with the given impedances. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Calculate the phase currents $I_1$, $I_2$, $I_3$, the neutral current $I_\rm N$ | ||
+ | * Calculate the true power, apparent power, and reactive power. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The following simulation has the same impedances in the load, but the load does not provide a neutral connection. | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | <callout title=" | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The simulation differs in the following: | ||
+ | * The network star-voltages $\underline{U}_{\rm 1N}$, $\underline{U}_{\rm 2N}$, $\underline{U}_{\rm 3N}$ related to the neutral potential $\underline{U}_\rm N$, and the load string voltages (= load star-voltages) $\underline{U}_{\rm 1S}$, $\underline{U}_{\rm 2S}$, $\underline{U}_{\rm 3S}$ related to the star potential of the load are separated. | ||
+ | * The star point voltage $\underline{U}_{\rm SN}$ from the potential of node $\rm S$tar point to $\rm N$eutral is shown. | ||
+ | * With the switch $S$, the star potential can short-circuited to the neutral potential; so set $\underline{U}_{\rm SN}=0$. This enables a comparison with the previous four-wire three-phase system. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Also here, the " | ||
+ | - **Voltages**: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{U}_{\rm 1S} &= \underline{U}_{\rm 1N} - \underline{U}_{\rm SN} \\ | ||
+ | \underline{U}_{\rm 2S} &= \underline{U}_{\rm 2N} - \underline{U}_{\rm SN} \\ | ||
+ | \underline{U}_{\rm 3S} &= \underline{U}_{\rm 3N} - \underline{U}_{\rm SN} \\ | ||
+ | \end{align*}</ | ||
+ | - **Currents**: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{I}_1 = {{\underline{U}_{\rm 1S}}\over{\underline{Z}_1^\phantom{O}}} \quad , \quad \underline{I}_2 | ||
+ | = {{\underline{U}_{\rm 2S}}\over{\underline{Z}_2^\phantom{O}}} \quad , \quad \underline{I}_3 | ||
+ | = {{\underline{U}_{\rm 3S}}\over{\underline{Z}_3^\phantom{O}}} | ||
+ | \end{align*} \\ | ||
+ | To get $\underline{U}_{\rm SN}$, one has to combine the individual formulas for $\underline{I}_x$, | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{U}_{\rm SN} = {{\sum_x \left( \Large{{{1}\over{\underline{Z}_x^\phantom{O}}}} | ||
+ | \cdot \normalsize{\underline{U}_{x \rm N}} \right) }\over{\sum_x \left( \Large{{{1}\over{\underline{Z}_x^\phantom{O}}}} \right) }} | ||
+ | \end{align*}</ | ||
+ | - Also here, the **true power** $P_x$ for each string is given by: < | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | P_x &= S_x \cdot \cos \varphi_x = U_{\rm S} \cdot I_x \cdot \cos \varphi_x | ||
+ | \end{align*} \\ | ||
+ | Also here, the resulting true power for the full load is (with $U_{\rm S}$ as the RMS value of the network star-voltage): | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | P &= U_{\rm S} \cdot ( I_1 \cdot \cos \varphi_1 | ||
+ | &= U_{\rm S} \cdot \left( I_1 \cdot \cos (\varphi_{u, | ||
+ | \end{align*}</ | ||
+ | - Since the three-wire system has no current out of the network star point, the **apparent power** $\underline{S}_x$ for each string is given by the string voltage and the current through the string $\underline{S}_x = \underline{U}_{x \rm S} \cdot \underline{I}_x^*$. This leads to an overall apparent power $\underline{S}$ of < | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{S} &= P + {\rm j}\cdot Q = \sum_x \underline{S}_x = \sum_x | ||
+ | In order to simplify the calculation, | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{S} &= \sum_x | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | Given that $\sum_x \underline{I}_x =0$, it is also true, that $\sum_x \underline{I}_x^* =0$ and so $\underline{I}_3^* = -\underline{I}_1^* - \underline{I}_2^*$. \\ | ||
+ | By this, one can further simplify the calculation for the apparent power down to \\ | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{S} &= \underline{U}_{13} \cdot \underline{I}_1^* + \underline{U}_{23} \cdot \underline{I}_2^* \\ | ||
+ | &= \underline{U}_{12} \cdot \underline{I}_1^* + \underline{U}_{32} \cdot \underline{I}_3^* | ||
+ | &= \underline{U}_{21} \cdot \underline{I}_2^* + \underline{U}_{31} \cdot \underline{I}_3^* | ||
+ | \end{align*} \\ | ||
+ | For the phase voltages it applies that: $\underline{U}_{12} = - \underline{U}_{21}$, | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | S_\Sigma &= \sqrt{ {{1}\over{2}} \cdot (U_{12}^2 + U_{23}^2 + U_{31}^2) } \cdot \sqrt{\sum_x I_x^2} &= \sqrt{3} U_{\rm S} \cdot \sqrt{\sum_x I_x^2} | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | - The abolute **reactive power** $Q$ can be calulated by the apparent power: < | ||
+ | \begin{align*} {\rm j}\cdot Q &= \underline{S} - P \end{align*} | ||
+ | the **collective reactive power** $Q_\Sigma$ is given by the collective apparent power: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} Q &= \sqrt{S_\Sigma^2 - P^2} \end{align*} | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <panel type=" | ||
+ | In the example, this leads to: | ||
+ | - The phase voltages are given as \begin{align*} U_{\rm L}=\sqrt{3} \cdot 231 {~\rm V} = & 400 {~\rm V} = U_{12} = U_{23} = U_{31} \end{align*} \\ The phasors of the star-voltages of the network are again given as \\ {{drawio> | ||
+ | - Based on the star-voltages of the network and the given impedances the star-voltage $\underline{U}_{\rm SN}$ of the load can be calculated with: < | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{U}_{\rm SN} = {{\sum_x \left( \Large{{{1}\over{\underline{Z}_x^\phantom{O}}}} \cdot \normalsize{\underline{U}_{x \rm N}} \right) } | ||
+ | | ||
+ | \end{align*} \\ | ||
+ | Once investigating the numerator $\sum_x \big( {{1}\over{\underline{Z}_x^\phantom{O}}} \cdot \underline{U}_{x \rm N} \big)$, once can see, that it just equals the sum of the phase currents of the four-wire system. So, the numerator equals the (in the three-wire system: fictive) current on the neutral line. \\ | ||
+ | The numerator is therefore: $22.88 {~\rm A} + {\rm j} \cdot 4.77 {~\rm A}$ (see calculation for the four-wire system). \\ | ||
+ | The denominator is: \\ | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \sum_x | ||
+ | + {{1}\over{5~\Omega + {{1}\over{{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi\cdot 50{~\rm Hz} \cdot 100 {~\rm µF} }} }} | ||
+ | + {{1}\over{20~\Omega }} \\ \\ | ||
+ | &= 0.1547 | ||
+ | The star-voltage $\underline{U}_{\rm SN}$ of the load is: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{U}_{\rm SN} &= {{22.88 {~\rm A} + {\rm j} \cdot 4.77 {~\rm A}}\over{0.1547 ~1/\Omega + {\rm j} \cdot 0.0275 ~1/\Omega}} \\ \\ | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | Given this star-voltage $\underline{U}_{\rm SN}$ of the load, the phase currents are: \\ | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{I}_1 &= {{\underline{U}_{\rm 1N} - \underline{U}_{\rm SN}}\over{\underline{Z}_1^\phantom{O}}} | ||
+ | & = & {{231{~\rm V} - 148.7{~\rm V} - {\rm j} \cdot 4.41 {~\rm V}}\over{10~\Omega + {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi\cdot 50{~\rm Hz} \cdot 1{~\rm mH} }} | ||
+ | & = & +8.21{~\rm A} - {\rm j} \cdot 0.70{~\rm A} & | ||
+ | \underline{I}_2 &= {{\underline{U}_{\rm 2N} - \underline{U}_{\rm SN}}\over{\underline{Z}_2^\phantom{O}}} | ||
+ | & = & {{231{~\rm V} \cdot \left( -{{1}\over{2}}-{\rm j}{{1}\over{2}}\sqrt{3}\right) - 148.7{~\rm V} - {\rm j} \cdot 4.41 {~\rm V}}\over{5~\Omega + {{1}\over{{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi\cdot 50{~\rm Hz} \cdot 100{~\rm µF} }}}} | ||
+ | & = & +5.00{~\rm A} + {\rm j} \cdot 9.08{~\rm A} & =& 10.36 {~\rm A} \quad \angle -61.2° \\ | ||
+ | \underline{I}_3 &= {{\underline{U}_{\rm 3N} - \underline{U}_{\rm SN}}\over{\underline{Z}_3^\phantom{O}}} | ||
+ | & = & {{231{~\rm V} \cdot \left( -{{1}\over{2}}+{\rm j}{{1}\over{2}}\sqrt{3}\right) - 148.7{~\rm V} - {\rm j} \cdot 4.41 {~\rm V}}\over{20~\Omega }} | ||
+ | &= & -13.21{~\rm A} + {\rm j} \cdot 9.78{~\rm A} & =& 16.44{~\rm A} \quad \angle +143.5° \end{align*} \\ </ | ||
+ | - The true power is calculated by: \\ \begin{align*} P = 231{~\rm V} \cdot \big( 8.24 {~\rm A} \cdot \cos (0° - (-4.9°))+ 10.36{~\rm A} \cdot \cos (-120° - (-61.2°)) + 16.44 {~\rm A} \cdot \cos (-240° - (+143.5°)\big) = 6.62 {~\rm kW} \end{align*} | ||
+ | - The apparent power $\underline{S}$ is: < | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{S} &= \underline{U}_{13} \cdot \underline{I}_1^* + \underline{U}_{23} \cdot \underline{I}_2^* | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | &= 6.62 {~\rm kW} - {\rm j} \cdot 3.40 {~\rm kVAr} \\ | ||
+ | &= \underline{U}_{21} \cdot \underline{I}_2^* + \underline{U}_{31} \cdot \underline{I}_3^* | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | &= 6.62 {~\rm kW} - {\rm j} \cdot 3.40 {~\rm kVAr} \\ | ||
+ | & = 7.44 {~\rm kVA} \quad \angle -27.2° | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | The collective apparent power is: \\ | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | S_\Sigma &= \sqrt{3} U_{\rm S} \cdot \sqrt{\sum_x I_x^2} \\ | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | = 8.45 {~\rm kVA} \end{align*} | ||
+ | - The reactive power is: < | ||
+ | \begin{align*} Q &= -{\rm j} \cdot (\underline{S} - P) = -3.40{~\rm kVAr} \\ | ||
+ | \end{align*} \\ | ||
+ | The collective reactive power is: \\ | ||
+ | \begin{align*} Q_\Sigma & | ||
+ | \end{align*} </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <callout title=" | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | The case of a symmetric load in a three-wire system equals the symmetric load in a four-wire system since the symmetric four-wire system also does not show a current on the neutral line. | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | \\ | ||
=== Load in Delta connection === | === Load in Delta connection === | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | The delta connection uses also a three-wire system like the Wye connection without the neutral line. | ||
+ | Internally, the load is now connected in a triangular shape. Therefore the individual string currents differ from the individual phase currents. | ||
+ | This setup is for the example given for motors when higher torque is needed. In this connection, each string sees $U_{\rm L} = \sqrt{3}\cdot U_{\rm S}$ and can therefore produce more current and more power. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the case of a delta connection, also only the potentials $\rm L1$, $\rm L2$, and $\rm L3$ are provided and used for power transfer. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <panel type=" | ||
+ | The example in the following simulation shows a $50 ~\rm Hz$ / $231 ~\rm V$ three-phase __three-wire system__ with an unbalanced load in delta connection, with the given impedances. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Calculate the phase currents $I_1$, $I_2$, $I_3$, the neutral current $I_\rm N$ | ||
+ | * Calculate the true power, apparent power, and reactive power. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The following simulation has the same impedances in the load, but the load does not provide a neutral connection. | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | <callout title=" | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The simulation differs in the following: | ||
+ | * The strings of the load are now connected to two phases and not to a star point anymore. | ||
+ | * The network phase voltages $\underline{U}_{12}$, | ||
+ | * The star point that the voltages are toward is in this case not relevant, and cannot be connected in any way to the strings. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Again here the " | ||
+ | - **Voltages**: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{U}_{12} &=& U_{\rm L} \cdot {\rm e}^{ {\rm j}\cdot {{1}\over{6}}} \\ | ||
+ | \underline{U}_{23} &=& U_{\rm L} \cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\cdot {{3}\over{6}}} \\ | ||
+ | \underline{U}_{31} &=& U_{\rm L} \cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\cdot {{7}\over{6}}} | ||
+ | \end{align*}</ | ||
+ | - **Currents**: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{I}_{1} = \underline{I}_{12} - \underline{I}_{31} \\ | ||
+ | \underline{I}_{2} = \underline{I}_{23} - \underline{I}_{12} \\ | ||
+ | \underline{I}_{3} = \underline{I}_{31} - \underline{I}_{23} \\ | ||
+ | \end{align*} \\ | ||
+ | The string currents can be calculated by the string voltages and the impedances: \\ | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{I}_{12} = {{\underline{U}_{12}}\over{\underline{Z}_{12}^\phantom{O}}} \quad , \quad | ||
+ | \underline{I}_{23} = {{\underline{U}_{23}}\over{\underline{Z}_{23}^\phantom{O}}} \quad , \quad | ||
+ | \underline{I}_{31} = {{\underline{U}_{31}}\over{\underline{Z}_{31}^\phantom{O}}} \end{align*} </ | ||
+ | - Also here, the **true power** can be calculated by adding up the true power of each phase. The faster way (as shown before) is to add up the (complex) apparent power. | ||
+ | - The **apparent power** $\underline{S}_x$ here is again the sum the (complex) apparent power for each string: < | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{S} &= \underline{U}_{12} \cdot \underline{I}_{12}^* | ||
+ | + \underline{U}_{23} \cdot \underline{I}_{23}^* | ||
+ | + \underline{U}_{31} \cdot \underline{I}_{31}^* | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | Since $\underline{U}_{12}$, | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \boxed{ | ||
+ | \underline{S} = P + {\rm j} \cdot Q | ||
+ | = U_{\rm L}^2 \cdot \left( {{1}\over{\underline{Z}_{12}^* }} | ||
+ | + {{1}\over{\underline{Z}_{23}^* }} | ||
+ | + {{1}\over{\underline{Z}_{31}^* }}\right) } | ||
+ | \end{align*} \\ | ||
+ | The **collective apparent power** $S_\Sigma$ here is the same as for the three-wire or four-wire connection. \\ | ||
+ | In the Delta connection the phase currents $I_x$ have to be calculated since the formula only applies to them: \\ | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | S_\Sigma &= \sqrt{ {{1}\over{3}} (U_{12}^2 + U_{23}^2 + U_{31}^2) } \cdot \sqrt{\sum_x I_x^2} &= U_{\rm L} \cdot \sqrt{\sum_x I_x^2} | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | - The abolute **reactive power** $Q$ can be calulated by the apparent power: < | ||
+ | \begin{align*} {\rm j}\cdot Q &= \underline{S} - P \end{align*} | ||
+ | the **collective reactive power** $Q_\Sigma$ is given by the collective apparent power: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} Q &= \sqrt{S_\Sigma^2 - P^2} \end{align*} | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <panel type=" | ||
+ | In the example, this leads to: | ||
+ | - The phase voltages are given as < | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | U_{\rm L}=\sqrt{3} \cdot 231 ~\rm V | ||
+ | = & 400 ~\rm V | ||
+ | = U_{12} = U_{23} = U_{31} | ||
+ | \end{align*} \\ | ||
+ | The phasors of the string voltages of the network are given as \\ | ||
+ | {{drawio> | ||
+ | - Based on the string voltages of the network and the given impedances the string currents $\underline{I}_{12}$, | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{I}_{12} &=& {{ 400 {~\rm V} \cdot\left(+{{1}\over{2}}\sqrt{3}+{{1}\over{2}} \cdot {\rm j} \right)}\over{ 10~\Omega + {\rm j} \cdot 2\pi\cdot 50 {~\rm Hz} \cdot 1 {~\rm mH} }} | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | \underline{I}_{23} &=& {{400 \cdot {\rm j}}\over{ 5~\Omega + {{1}\over{{\rm j} \cdot 2\pi\cdot 50 {~\rm Hz} \cdot 100 {~\rm µF}}} }} | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | \underline{I}_{31} &=& {{400 {~\rm V} \cdot\left(-{{1}\over{2}}\sqrt{3}+{{1}\over{2}} \cdot {\rm j} \right)}\over{ 20 ~\Omega}} | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | By these voltages the phase currents $\underline{I}_x$ can be calculated: \\ | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{I}_{1} &=& ( 35.24 {~\rm A} + {\rm j} \cdot 18.90 {~\rm A}) - (-17.33 {~\rm A} + {\rm j} \cdot 10.00 {~\rm A}) & | ||
+ | &=& 53.32 {~\rm A} \quad &\angle 9.6° \\ | ||
+ | \underline{I}_{2} &=& ( 12.27 {~\rm A} - {\rm j} \cdot 1.93 {~\rm A}) - ( 35.24 {~\rm A} + {\rm j} \cdot 18.90 {~\rm A}) &=& -22.98 {~\rm A} - {\rm j} \cdot 20.83 {~\rm A} | ||
+ | &=& -31.01 {~\rm A} \quad &\angle -137.8° \\ | ||
+ | \underline{I}_{3} &=& (-17.33 {~\rm A} + {\rm j} \cdot 10.00 {~\rm A}) - ( 12.27 {~\rm A} - {\rm j} \cdot 1.93 {~\rm A}) &=& -29.59 {~\rm A} + {\rm j} \cdot 11.93 {~\rm A} | ||
+ | &=& 31.90 {~\rm A} \quad &\angle 158.0° | ||
+ | \end{align*} \\</ | ||
+ | - The true power is calculated by: < | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | P = 231 {~\rm V} \cdot \big( 53.32 {~\rm A} \cdot \cos ( 0° - (9.6°) | ||
+ | - 31.01 {~\rm A} \cdot \cos (-120° - (-137.8°) | ||
+ | + 31.90 {~\rm A} \cdot \cos (-240° - (+158.0°) \big) | ||
+ | = 24.77 {~\rm kW} \end{align*}</ | ||
+ | - The apparent power $\underline{S}$ is: < | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{S} &= \underline{U}_{13} \cdot \underline{I}_1^* + \underline{U}_{23} \cdot \underline{I}_2^* | ||
+ | &=& 400 {~\rm V} \cdot (- {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \cdot 7/6 \pi} \cdot ( 52.57 {~\rm A} - {\rm j} \cdot 8.90 {~\rm A}) + | ||
+ | {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \cdot 3/6 \pi} \cdot (-22.98 {~\rm A} + {\rm j} \cdot 20.83 {~\rm A})) | ||
+ | &= 24.77 {~\rm kW} - {\rm j} \cdot 4.41 {~\rm kVAr} \\ | ||
+ | &= \underline{U}_{12} \cdot \underline{I}_1^* + \underline{U}_{32} \cdot \underline{I}_3^* | ||
+ | &=& 400 {~\rm V} \cdot ( {\rm e}^{ {\rm j} \cdot 1/6 \pi} \cdot ( 52.57 {~\rm A} - {\rm j} \cdot 8.90 {~\rm A}) - | ||
+ | {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \cdot 3/6 \pi} \cdot (-29.59 {~\rm A} - {\rm j} \cdot 11.93 {~\rm A})) | ||
+ | &= 24.77 {~\rm kW} - {\rm j} \cdot 4.41 {~\rm kVAr} \\ | ||
+ | &= \underline{U}_{21} \cdot \underline{I}_2^* + \underline{U}_{31} \cdot \underline{I}_3^* | ||
+ | &=& 400 {~\rm V} \cdot (- {\rm e}^{ {\rm j} \cdot 1/6 \pi} \cdot (-22.98 {~\rm A} + {\rm j} \cdot 20.83 {~\rm A}) + | ||
+ | {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \cdot 7/6 \pi} \cdot (-29.59 {~\rm A} - {\rm j} \cdot 11.93 {~\rm A})) | ||
+ | &= 24.77 {~\rm kW} - {\rm j} \cdot 4.41 {~\rm kVAr} \\ | ||
+ | & = 25.16 {~\rm kVA} \quad \angle -10.09°\end{align*} | ||
+ | The collective apparent power is: \\ | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | S_\Sigma &= U_{\rm L} \cdot \sqrt{\sum_x I_x^2} \\ | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | = 27.78 {~\rm kVA} \end{align*} | ||
+ | - The reactive power is: < | ||
+ | \begin{align*} Q &= |\underline{S} - P| = -4.41 {~\rm kVAr} \\ | ||
+ | \end{align*} \\ | ||
+ | The collective reactive power is: \\ | ||
+ | \begin{align*} Q_\Sigma & | ||
+ | \end{align*}</ | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP hide> | ||
+ | <callout title=" | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | In the case of a symmetric load, the situation and the formulas get much simpler: | ||
+ | - The **phase voltages** $U_{\rm L}$ and string voltages $U_{\rm S}$ are equal to the asymmetric load: $U_{\rm L} = U_{\rm S}$. | ||
+ | - For equal impedances the absolute value of all **phase currents** $I_{\rm L} = I_x$ are the same: $|\underline{I}_x|= {3}\cdot|\underline{I}_{\rm S}| = \sqrt{3}\cdot\left|{{\underline{U}_{\rm S}}\over{\underline{Z}_{\rm S}^\phantom{O}}}\right|$. Since the phase currents have the same absolute value and have the same $\varphi$, they will add up to zero. Therefore there is no current on the neutral line: $I_N =0$ | ||
+ | - | ||
+ | - The **true power** is three times the true power of a single phase: $P = 3 \cdot U_{\rm S} I_{\rm S} \cdot \cos \varphi$. Based on the line voltages $U_{\rm L}$, the formula is $P = \sqrt{3} \cdot U_{\rm L} I_{\rm S} \cdot \cos \varphi$ | ||
+ | - The **(collective) apparent power** - given the formula above - is: $S_\Sigma = \sqrt{3}\cdot U_{\rm S} \cdot \sqrt{3\cdot I_{\rm S}^2} = 3 \cdot U_{\rm S} I_{\rm S}$. This corresponds to three times the apparent power of a single phase. | ||
+ | - The **reactive power** leads to: $Q_\Sigma = \sqrt{S_\Sigma^2 - P^2} = 3 \cdot U_{\rm S} I_{\rm S} \cdot \sin (\varphi)$. | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Overview of the Power in different Connections === | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
===== Excercises ===== | ===== Excercises ===== | ||
Zeile 399: | Zeile 849: | ||
<panel type=" | <panel type=" | ||
- | A passive component is fed by a sinosidal | + | A passive component is fed by a sinusoidal |
- | - Draw the equivalent circuits based on a series and on a parallel circuit. | + | 1. Draw the equivalent circuits based on a series and on a parallel circuit. |
- | | + | |
- | - Calculate | + | # |
- | - Check the solutions from 3. via direct calculation based on the input in the task above. | + | {{drawio> |
+ | # | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. Calculate the equivalent components for both circuits. | ||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
+ | |||
+ | The apparent impedance is: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | Z = |\underline{Z}| & | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | For the **series circuit**, the impedances add up like: $R_s + {\rm j}\cdot X_{Ls} = \underline{Z} $, and $R_s = |\underline{Z}| \cos\varphi$ such as $X_{Ls} = |\underline{Z}| \sin\varphi$. | ||
+ | Therefore: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | R_s & | ||
+ | X_{Ls} & | ||
+ | \rightarrow L_s &=& {{X_{Ls}}\over{2\pi f}} &=& {{{{U}\over{I}} \cdot \sin \varphi}\over{2\pi f}} &=& \boldsymbol{127~\rm mH} | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | \\ \\ | ||
+ | For the **parallel circuit**, the impedances add up like ${{1}\over{R_p}} + {{1}\over{{\rm j}\cdot X_{Lp}}}= {{1}\over{\underline{Z}}} $ with $\underline{Z} = {{U}\over{I}}\cdot e^{j\cdot \varphi}$. \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | There are multiple ways to solve this problem. Two ways shall be shown here: | ||
+ | |||
+ | === with the Euler representation === | ||
+ | Given the formula $\underline{Z} = {{U}\over{I}}\cdot e^{j\cdot \varphi}$ the following can be derived: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | {{1}\over{\underline{Z}^{\phantom{A}}}} &= {{I}\over{U}}\cdot e^{-j\cdot \varphi} \\ | ||
+ | &= {{1}\over{Z}}\cdot e^{-j\cdot \varphi} &&= {{1}\over{R_p}} + {{1}\over{{\rm j}\cdot X_{Lp}}} | ||
+ | &= {{1}\over{Z}}\cdot \left( \cos(\varphi) - {\rm j}\cdot \sin(\varphi) \right) &&= {{1}\over{R_p}} - {{\rm j}\over{X_{Lp}}} | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Therefore, the following can be concluded: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | {{1}\over{Z}}\cdot \cos(\varphi) | ||
+ | - {\rm j}\cdot \sin(\varphi) | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | === with the calculated values of the series circuit === | ||
+ | Another way is to use the formulas of $R_s$ and $X_{Ls}$ from before. | ||
+ | |||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | {{1}\over{R_p}} + {{1}\over{{\rm j}\cdot X_{Lp}}} &=& {{1}\over{R_s + {\rm j}\cdot X_{Ls}}} \\ | ||
+ | {{1}\over{R_p}} - {\rm j} {{1}\over{X_{Lp}}} | ||
+ | &=& {{Z \cdot \cos \varphi - {\rm j}\cdot Z \cdot \sin \varphi }\over{Z^2}} \\ | ||
+ | &=& { {\cos \varphi - {\rm j} \cdot \sin \varphi } | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Therefore | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now, the real and imaginary part is analyzed individually. First the real part: | ||
+ | |||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | {{1}\over{R_p}} | ||
+ | \rightarrow R_p & | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | {{1}\over{X_{Lp}}} | ||
+ | \rightarrow X_{Lp} | ||
+ | \rightarrow L_p & | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
+ | For the series circuit: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | R_s &= {23 ~\Omega} \\ | ||
+ | L_s &= {127 ~\rm mH} \\ | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | For the parallel circuit: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | R_p &= {92 ~\Omega} \\ | ||
+ | L_p &= {169 ~\rm mH} \\ | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | # | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. Calculate the real, reactive, and apparent power based on the equivalent components for both circuits from 2. . \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
+ | The general formula for the apparent power is $\underline{S} = U \cdot I \cdot e^{\rm j\varphi}$. \\ By this, the following can be derived: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{S} &= U \cdot I \cdot e^{\rm j\varphi} \\ | ||
+ | &= Z \cdot I^2 \cdot e^{\rm j\varphi} | ||
+ | &= {{U^2}\over{Z}} \cdot e^{\rm j\varphi} &&= {{U^2}\over{\underline{Z}^{*\phantom{I}}}} \\ | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | These formulas are handy for both types of circuits to separate the apparent power into real part (real power) and complex part (apparent power): | ||
+ | - for **series circuit**: $\underline{S} =\underline{Z} \cdot I^2 $ with $\underline{Z} = R + {\rm j} X_L$ | ||
+ | - for **parallel circuit**: $\underline{S} ={{U^2}\over{\underline{Z}^{*\phantom{I}}}} $ with ${{1} \over {\underline{Z}^{\phantom{I}}} } = {{1}\over{R}} + {{1}\over{{\rm j} X_L}} \rightarrow {{1} \over {\underline{Z}^{*\phantom{I}}} } = {{1}\over{R}} + {{\rm j}\over{ X_L}} $ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | Therefore: | ||
+ | ^ ^ series circuit ^ parallel circuit ^ | ||
+ | | active | ||
+ | | reactive power | \begin{align*} Q_s &= X_{Ls} \cdot I^2 \\ &= 39.8 ~\Omega \cdot (5{~\rm A})^2 \\ &= 996 {~\rm Var} \end{align*} | \begin{align*} Q_p &= {{U_p^2}\over{X_{Lp}}} \\ &= {{(230{~\rm V})^2}\over{53.1 ~\Omega}} = 996 {~\rm Var} | ||
+ | | apparent power | \begin{align*} S_s &= \sqrt{P_s^2 - Q_s^2} \\ &= I^2 \cdot \sqrt{R_s^2 + X_{Ls}^2} \\ &= 1150 {~\rm VA} \end{align*} | \begin{align*} S_p &= \sqrt{P_s^2 - Q_s^2} \\ &= U^2 \cdot \sqrt{{{1}\over{R_p^2}} + {{1}\over{X_{Lp}^2}}} \\ &= 1150 {~\rm VA} | ||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
+ | |||
+ | 4. Check the solutions from 3. via direct calculation based on the input in the task above. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <button size=" | ||
+ | |||
+ | active power: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | P &= U \cdot I \cdot \cos \varphi \\ | ||
+ | &= 220{~\rm V} \cdot 5{~\rm A} \cos 60° \\ | ||
+ | &= 575 {~\rm W} | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | reactive power: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | Q &= U \cdot I \cdot \sin \varphi \\ | ||
+ | &= 230{~\rm V} \cdot 5{~\rm A} \sin 60° \\ | ||
+ | &= 996 {~\rm Var} | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | apparent power: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | S &= U \cdot I \\ | ||
+ | &= 230{~\rm V} \cdot 5{~\rm A} \\ | ||
+ | &= 1150 {~\rm VA} | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | </ | ||
</ | </ | ||
Zeile 410: | Zeile 986: | ||
<panel type=" | <panel type=" | ||
- | A magnetic coil shows at a frequency of $f=50Hz$ the voltage of $U=115V$ and the current $I=2.6A$ with a power factor of $cos \varphi = 0.30$ | + | A magnetic coil shows at a frequency of $f=50.0 {~\rm Hz}$ the voltage of $U=115{~\rm V}$ and the current $I=2.60{~\rm A}$ with a power factor of $\cos \varphi = 0.30$ |
- | - Calculate the real power, the reactive power and the apparent power . | + | - Calculate the real power, the reactive power, and the apparent power . |
- Draw the equivalent parallel circuit. Calculate the active and reactive part of the current. | - Draw the equivalent parallel circuit. Calculate the active and reactive part of the current. | ||
- | - Draw the equivalent series circuit. Calculate the ohmic and inductive impedance and the inductivity. | + | - Draw the equivalent series circuit. Calculate the ohmic and inductive impedance and the value of the inductivity. |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <button size=" | ||
+ | |||
+ | The real power is | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | P &= U \cdot I \cdot \cos \varphi \\ | ||
+ | &= 115{~\rm V} \cdot 2.6{~\rm A} \cdot 0.3 \\ | ||
+ | &= 89.7 {~\rm W} | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | The reactive power is | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | Q &= U \cdot I \cdot \sin \varphi \\ | ||
+ | &= 115{~\rm V} \cdot 2.6{~\rm V} \cdot \sqrt{1 - 0.3^2} \\ | ||
+ | &= 285 {~\rm Var} | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | The apparent power is | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | S &= U \cdot I \\ | ||
+ | &= 115{~\rm V} \cdot 2.6{~\rm A} \\ | ||
+ | &= 299 {~\rm VA} | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <button size=" | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{drawio> | ||
+ | |||
+ | The complex current $\underline{I}$ is given as: | ||
+ | |||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{I} &= I_R + {\rm j} \cdot I_L \\ | ||
+ | &= I \cdot \cos\varphi - {\rm j} \cdot I \cdot \sin\varphi | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | The active and reactive part of the current is therefore: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | I_R & | ||
+ | I_L &= - 2.60{~\rm A} \cdot \sqrt{1 - 0.30^2} &= 2.48 {~\rm A} | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <button size=" | ||
+ | |||
+ | Important: The cosine function is ambiguous! Based on $\cos \varphi = 0.30$ it is unclear, whether $\varphi$ is positive or negative. \\ | ||
+ | Therefore, only based on the power factor it is unclear whether the circuit is ohmic-inductive or ohmic-capacitive! However, this is explicitly given in the problem definition. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{drawio> | ||
+ | |||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | Z_s &= {{U}\over{I}} | ||
+ | R_s &= {{U}\over{I}} \cdot \cos \varphi &=& {{115{~\rm V}}\over{2.60{~\rm A}}} \cdot 0.30 &=& 13.3 ~\Omega \\ | ||
+ | X_{Ls} &= {{U}\over{I}} \cdot \sin \varphi &=& {{115{~\rm V}}\over{2.60{~\rm A}}} \cdot \sqrt{1 - 0.30^2} &=& 42.2 ~\Omega \\ \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | L_s & | ||
+ | |||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ | ||
</ | </ | ||
Zeile 420: | Zeile 1059: | ||
<panel type=" | <panel type=" | ||
- | A consumer is connected to a $220V$ network. A current of $20A$ and a power of $1800W$ is measured. | + | A consumer is connected to a $220~\rm V$ / $50 ~\rm Hz$ network. A current of $20.0~\rm A$ and a power of $1800 ~\rm W$ is measured. |
- | - What is the value of the active power, the reactive power and the power factor? | + | - What is the value of the active power, the reactive power, and the power factor? |
- Assume that the consumer is a parallel circuit. | - Assume that the consumer is a parallel circuit. | ||
- Calculate the resistance and reactance. | - Calculate the resistance and reactance. | ||
- | - Calculate the necessary inductance / capacitance. | + | - Calculate the necessary inductance/ |
- Assume that the consumer is a series circuit. | - Assume that the consumer is a series circuit. | ||
- Calculate the resistance and reactance. | - Calculate the resistance and reactance. | ||
- | - Calculate the necessary inductance / capacitance. | + | - Calculate the necessary inductance/ |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <button size=" | ||
+ | |||
+ | The active power is $P = 1.80 ~\rm kW$. \\ \\ | ||
+ | The apparent power is $S = U \cdot I = 220 ~\rm V \cdot 20 ~\rm A = 4.40 ~\rm kVA$. \\ \\ | ||
+ | The reactive power is $Q = \sqrt{S^2 - P^2} = \sqrt{(4.40 ~\rm kVA)^2 - (1.80 ~\rm kW)^2} = 4.01 ~\rm kVar$ \\ \\ | ||
+ | The power factor is $\cos \varphi = {{P}\over{S}} = {{1.80 ~\rm kW}\over{4.40 ~\rm kVA}} = 0.41$. | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <button size=" | ||
+ | |||
+ | Important: The cosine function is ambiguous! Based on $\cos \varphi = 0.30$ it is unclear, whether $\varphi$ is positive or negative. \\ | ||
+ | Therefore, only based on the power factor it is unclear whether the circuit is ohmic-inductive or ohmic-capacitive! | ||
+ | |||
+ | The consumer is a parallel circuit of the resistance $R_\rm p$ and the reactance $X_\rm p$ on the voltage $U$. Both values can be calculated based on the real and reactive power: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | P &= {{U^2}\over{R_\rm p}} \rightarrow & R_p &= {{U^2}\over{P}} &= 26.9 ~\Omega \\ | ||
+ | Q &= {{U^2}\over{X_\rm p}} \rightarrow & X_p &= {{U^2}\over{Q}} &= 12.1 ~\Omega \\ | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | The respective values for inductance/ | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | L &= {{X_p}\over{2\pi \cdot f}} & | ||
+ | C &= {{1}\over{2\pi \cdot f \cdot X_p}} &= 263 ~\rm µF \\ | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <button size=" | ||
+ | |||
+ | The consumer is a series circuit of the resistance $R_\rm s$ and the reactance $X_\rm s$ with the current $I$. Both values can be calculated based on the real and reactive power: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | P &= I^2 \cdot R_{\rm s} \rightarrow & R_{\rm s} &= {{P}\over{I^2}} &= 4.50 ~\Omega \\ | ||
+ | Q &= I^2 \cdot X_{\rm s} \rightarrow & X_{\rm s} &= {{Q}\over{I^2}} &= 10.0 ~\Omega \\ | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | The respective values for inductance/ | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | L &= {{X_{\rm s}}\over{2\pi \cdot f}} & | ||
+ | C &= {{1}\over{2\pi \cdot f \cdot X_{\rm s}}} &= 318 ~\rm µF \\ | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ | ||
</ | </ | ||
Zeile 434: | Zeile 1118: | ||
<panel type=" | <panel type=" | ||
- | An uncompensated ohmic-inductive series circuit shows at $U=230V$, $f=50Hz$ the current $I_{RL}=7A$, $P_{RL}=1.3kW$ | + | An uncompensated ohmic-inductive series circuit shows at $U=230~\rm V$, $f=50 ~\rm Hz$ the current $I_{RL}=7 ~\rm A$, $P_{RL}=1.3 ~\rm kW$ |
- | The power factor shall be compensated to $cos\varphi = 1$ via a parallel compensation. | + | The power factor shall be compensated to $\cos\varphi = 1$ via a parallel compensation. |
- | - Calculate the apparent power, the reactive power, the phase angle and the power factor before the compensation. | + | - Calculate the apparent power, the reactive power, the phase angle, and the power factor before the compensation. |
- | - Calculate the capacity $C$ which have to be connected in parallel | + | - Calculate the capacity $C$ which has to be connected in parallel to get $\cos\varphi=1$. |
- | <button size=" | + | <button size=" |
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | S | ||
+ | Q | ||
+ | \varphi & | ||
+ | = \arccos\left({{P}\over{S}}\right) | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
- | The inductor $L$ creates the reactive power $Q = Q_L$. In order to compensate a equivalent reactive power $|Q_C| = |Q_L|$ has to be given by a capacitor. The reactive power is given by \begin{align*} Q &= \Re (U) \cdot \Im (I) \\ &= U \cdot {{U}\over{X}} \\ &= {{U^2}\over{X}} \\ \end{align*} | + | The inductor $L$ creates the reactive power $Q = Q_L$. To compensate |
+ | The reactive power is given by: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | Q &= \Re (U) \cdot \Im (I) \\ | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
- | The capacity can therefore be calculated by \begin{align*} X_C &= {{U^2}\over{Q_L}} = {{1}\over{\omega C}} \quad \rightarrow \quad C = {{1}\over{\omega U^2}} \end{align*} | + | The capacity can therefore be calculated by |
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | X_C &= {{U^2}\over{Q_L}} = {{1}\over{\omega C}} \quad \rightarrow \quad C = {{1}\over{\omega U^2}} | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | <button size=" | + | <button size=" |
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | S &= 1.62 {~\rm kVA} \\ | ||
+ | Q &= 0.95 {~\rm kVAr} \\ | ||
+ | \varphi &= +36° \\ \\ | ||
+ | C &= 57.2 ~\rm µF | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
</ | </ | ||
</ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <panel type=" | ||
+ | |||
+ | A three-phase power net with a phase voltage of $400 ~\rm V$ has two symmetrical ohmic-inductive loads connected to it. The true power and the power factor are given as follows: | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Load 1: $P_1 = 2.7 ~\rm kW$, $\cos \varphi_1 = 0.89$ | ||
+ | * Load 1: $P_2 = 3.8 ~\rm kW$, $\cos \varphi_1 = 0.76$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1. Calculate the reactive power $Q_1$ and $Q_2$. \\ | ||
+ | <button size=" | ||
+ | First, calculate the apparent power: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | P_1 &=& S_1 \cdot \cos \varphi_1 \quad \rightarrow \quad S_1 &=& {{1}\over{\cos \varphi_1}} \cdot P_1 &=& {{1}\over{0.89}} \cdot 2.7 {~\rm kW} &=& 3.0 {~\rm kVA}\\ | ||
+ | P_2 &=& S_2 \cdot \cos \varphi_2 \quad \rightarrow \quad S_2 &=& {{1}\over{\cos \varphi_2}} \cdot P_1 &=& {{1}\over{0.76}} \cdot 3.8 {~\rm kW} &=& 5.0 {~\rm kVA}\\ | ||
+ | \end{align*} \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | For calculating the reactive power, $\sin \varphi_{1, | ||
+ | * One way would be to calculate $\varphi_{1, | ||
+ | * Another way is to use the formula $1^2 = \sin^2\varphi_{1, | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | Q_1 &=& S_1 \cdot \sqrt{1 - \cos^2 \varphi_1} &=& 3.0 {~\rm kVA} \cdot \sqrt{1 - 0.89^2} &=& 1.4 {~\rm kVAr}\\ | ||
+ | Q_2 &=& S_2 \cdot \sqrt{1 - \cos^2 \varphi_2} &=& 5.0 {~\rm kVA} \cdot \sqrt{1 - 0.76^2} &=& 3.2 {~\rm kVAr}\\ | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | Q_1 &=& 1.4 {~\rm kVAr}\\ | ||
+ | Q_2 &=& 3.2 {~\rm kVAr}\\ | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. Which (complex) apparent power does the net have to provide for both loads combined? \\ | ||
+ | <button size=" | ||
+ | |||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{S}_{\rm net} &=& \underline{S}_1 | ||
+ | &=& P_1 + {\rm j} \cdot Q_1 & | ||
+ | &=& P_1 + P_2 & | ||
+ | &=& 2.7 {~\rm kW} + 3.8 {~\rm kW} &+& {\rm j} \cdot (1.4 {~\rm kVAr} + 3.2 {~\rm kVAr}) \\ | ||
+ | &=& 6.5 {~\rm kW} & | ||
+ | &=& P_{\rm net} & | ||
+ | \end{align*} \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | As a complex value in Euler representation: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{S}_{\rm net} &=& \sqrt{P_{\rm net}^2 | ||
+ | \sqrt{(6.5 {~\rm kW})^2+ | ||
+ | 8.0 {~\rm kVA} & | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \underline{S}_{\rm net} &=& 6.5 {~\rm kW} + {\rm j} \cdot 4.6 {~\rm kVAr} \\ | ||
+ | &=& 8.0 {~\rm kVA} \cdot {\rm e}^{{\rm j} \cdot 35°} \\ | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. Calculate the RMS value of the single-phase current $I$ which the power net has to provide. \\ | ||
+ | <button size=" | ||
+ | The apparent power $S_{\rm net}$ is given by $S_{\rm net} = 3 \cdot U \cdot I$, with $U$ as the star-voltage $U_Y = {{1}\over{ \sqrt{3} }} \cdot U_{\rm L}$. \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Therefore, the single-phase current $I$ can be calculated from $S_{\rm net}$: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | S_{\rm net} &=& 3 \cdot U \cdot I \\ | ||
+ | &=& \sqrt{3} \cdot U_{\rm L} \cdot I \\ | ||
+ | \end{align*} \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The current is: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | I &=& {{ S_{\rm net} }\over{ \sqrt{3} \cdot U_{\rm L} }} \\ | ||
+ | &=& {{8.0 {~\rm kVA}}\over{ \sqrt{3} \cdot 400{~\rm V} }} \\ | ||
+ | &=& 12{~\rm A} \\ | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | I &=& 12 ~\rm A \\ | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | 4. What is the overall power factor $\cos\varphi_{\rm net}$ of the power net? \\ | ||
+ | <button size=" | ||
+ | The overall power factor can be calculated from the apparent power and its angle $\varphi_{\rm net}$ (see the Euler representation in task 2). \\ | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \cos\varphi_{\rm net} = \cos (35°) = 0.82 | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \cos\varphi_{\rm net} = 0.82 | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
+ | |||
+ | A three-phase motor is connected to a three-phase system with a phase voltage of $400 ~\rm V$. The phase current is $16 ~\rm A$ and the power factor $0.85$. \\ | ||
+ | Calculate the active power, reactive power, and apparent power. | ||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
+ | |||
+ | A symmetrical and balanced three-phase motor of a production line shall be configured in star configuration and provide a power of $17~\rm kW$ with a power factor of $0.65$. The voltage on a single string is measured to be $125 ~\rm V$. \\ | ||
+ | Calculate the string current. | ||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
==== Related Links ==== | ==== Related Links ==== |