Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- electrical_engineering_2:the_stationary_electric_flow [2022/03/10 12:47]
tfischer
+++ electrical_engineering_2:the_stationary_electric_flow [2024/03/29 19:57] (aktuell)
mexleadmin
@@ Zeile 1: / Zeile 1: @@
-====== 2. The sationary electric Flow Field ======
+====== 2 The stationary Current Density and Flux ======
 <callout>
+The online book 'University Physics II' is strongly recommended as a reference for this chapter. Especially the following chapters:
+  * Chapter [[https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/University_Physics/Book%3A_University_Physics_(OpenStax)/Book%3A_University_Physics_II_-_Thermodynamics_Electricity_and_Magnetism_(OpenStax)/09%3A_Current_and_Resistance/9.03%3A_Model_of_Conduction_in_Metals|9.3 Model of Conduction in Metals]]
-At the dissusion of the electrostatic field in principle no charges in motion were considered. Now the motion of charges shall be considered explicitly.
+</callout>
-The electric flow field here describes how charge carriers move together (collectively). The stationary flow field describes the charge carrier movement if a **direct voltage** is the cause of the movement. A constant direct current then flows in the stationary electric flow field. Thus there is no time dependence of the current:
+In the discussion of the electrostatic field in principle, no charges in motion were considered. Now the motion of charges shall be considered explicitly.
-$\large{{dI}\over{dt}}=0$
+The current density here describes how charge carriers move together (collectively). The stationary current density describes the charge carrier movement if a **direct voltage**  is the cause of the movement. A constant direct current then flows in the stationary electric flow field. Thus, there is no time dependency on the current:
-Also important is: Up to now was considered, charges did move through a field or could be moved in future. Now just the moment of the movement is considered.
+$\large{{{\rm d}I}\over{{\rm d}t}}=0$
-</callout>
+Also important is: Up to now was considered, charges did move through a field or could be moved in the future. Now just the moment of the movement is considered.
-===== 2.1 Current Strength and Flow Field =====
+===== 2.1 Current Strength and Flux Field =====
 <callout>
-=== Goals ===
+=== Learning Objectives ===
-After this lesson, you should:
-  - be able to sketch the flow field in a constricted and rectilinear conductor.
+By the end of this section, you will be able to:
-  - Be able to determine the flow velocity of electrons.
+  - sketch the flux field in a constricted and rectilinear conductor.
+  - determine the flow velocity of electrons.
   - know the integral notation of the electric current.
 </callout>
-<WRAP>
-<imgcaption imageNo01 | part of a Conductor>
-</imgcaption>
-{{drawio>charges_in_conductor}}
-</WRAP>
-==== Current intensity and current density in the simple case ====
+==== Current and current density in a Simple Case ====
-The current strength was previously understood as "charge per time" ($I={{dQ}\over{dt}}$). Microscopically, electric current is the directed motion of electric charge carriers. In the chapter [[basics_and_basic_concepts#charge_and_current|basics and basic_concepts]] we have already discussed the picture of the charge carrier current penetrating through a cross-sectional area $A$ (see <imgref FigNo01>).
+The current strength was previously understood as "charge per time" ($I={{{\rm d}Q}\over{{\rm d}t}}$). Microscopically, electric current is the directed motion of electric charge carriers. In the chapter [[electrical_engineering_1:preparation_properties_proportions#qualitative_view|Basic concepts]] we have already discussed the picture of the charge carrier current penetrating through a cross-sectional area $A$ (see <imgref ImgNr01>). Furthermore, we had quite practically applied Ohm's law with $R = {{U}\over{I}}$ in DC. Now we know that the voltage in an electrostatic field can be derived from the electric field strength. But what about the current?
-Furthermore, we had quite practically applied Ohm's law with $R = {{U}\over{I}}$ in DC. Now we know that from the electrostatic field the voltage can be derived from the electric field strength. But what about the current?
-For this purpose, the packet $dQ$ of charges is considered, which will pass the area $A$ in the future in the period $dt$. These charges are located in a partial volume element $dV$, which is given by the area $A$ to be traversed and a partial section $dx$: $dV = A \cdot dx$. The amount of charges per volume is given by the charge carrier density, specifically for metals by the electron density $n_e$. The electron density $n_e$ gives the number of free electrons per unit volume a. For copper, for example, this is approximately $n_e(Cu)=8.47 \cdot 10^{19} {{1}\over{mm^3}}$.
+<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr01 | part of a Conductor> </imgcaption> {{drawio>charges_in_conductor.svg}} </WRAP>
-~~PAGEBREAK~~~CLEARFIX~~~
+For this purpose, a packet of charges ${\rm d}Q$ is considered, which will pass the area $A$ during the period ${\rm d}t$ (see <imgref imageNo02>). These charges are located in a partial volume element ${\rm d}V$, which is given by the area $A$ to be traversed and a partial section ${\rm d}x$: ${\rm d}V = A \cdot {\rm d}x$. The amount of charges per volume is given by the charge carrier density, specifically for metals by the electron density $n_{\rm e}$. The electron density $n_{\rm e}$ gives the number of free electrons per unit volume a. For copper, for example, this is approximately $n_{\rm e}({\rm Cu})=8.47 \cdot 10^{19} ~{\rm {1}\over{mm^3}}$.
-<WRAP>
+~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~
-<imgcaption imageNo02 | Charges in a partial volume in the conductor>
-</imgcaption> <WRAP>.
+<WRAP> <imgcaption imageNo02 | Charges in a partial volume in the conductor> </imgcaption> <WRAP> {{drawio>ChargesInConductorVolume.svg}} \\ </WRAP>
-{{drawio>ChargesInConductorVolume}} \\
-</WRAP>
 The flowing charges contained in the partial volume element $dV$ are then (with elementary charge $e_0$):
-\begin{align*}
+\begin{align*} {\rm d} Q = n_{\rm e} \cdot e_0 \cdot A \cdot  {\rm d}x \end{align*}
-dQ = n_e \cdot e_0 \cdot A \cdot dx
-\end{align*}
-The current is then given by $I={{dQ}\over{dt}}$:
+The current is then given by $I={{{\rm d}Q}\over{{\rm d}t}}$:
-\begin{align*}
+\begin{align*} I = n_{\rm e} \cdot e_0 \cdot A \cdot {{{\rm d}x}\over{{\rm d}t}} = n_e \cdot e_0 \cdot A \cdot v_{\rm e} \end{align*}
-dQ = n_e \cdot e_0 \cdot A \cdot {{dx}\cdot{dt}} = n_e \cdot e_0 \cdot A \cdot v_e
-\end{align*}
-This gives an electron velocity $v_e$ of:
+This leads to an electron velocity $v_e$ of:
-\begin{align*}
+\begin{align*} v_{\rm e} = {{{\rm d}x}\over{{\rm d}t}} = {{I}\over{n_{\rm e} \cdot e_0 \cdot A }} \end{align*}
-v_e = {{dx}\cdot{dt}} = {{I}\over{n_e \cdot e_0 \cdot A }}
-\end{align*}
-In contrast to the considerations in electrostatics, the charge inertia now travels with finite velocities.
+In contrast to the considerations in electrostatics, the charges now travel with finite velocities.
-With regard to the electron velocity $v_e \sim {{I}\over{A}}$ it is obvious to determine a current density $S$ (related to the area):
+With regard to the electron velocity $v_{\rm e} \sim {{I}\over{A}}$ it is obvious to determine a current density $S$ (related to the area):
-\begin{align}}
+\begin{align*}
-\boxed{S = {{I}\over{A}}
+\boxed{S = {{I}\over{A}}}
 \end{align*}
 In some books, the letter $J$ is alternatively used for current density.
+~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~
-~~PAGEBREAK~~~CLEARFIX~~~
-==== Field lines and Equipotential Surfaces of the electric Flow Field ====
-<WRAP>
+==== Field lines and Equipotential Surfaces of the Current Density ====
-<imgcaption imageNo03 | Field lines and equipotential surfaces of the electric flow field>.
-</imgcaption> <WRAP>.
-{{drawio>fieldlineelectricflowfield}} \\
-</WRAP>
+The values of the current density can be given for any point in space. Therefore, the current density can also be considered as a field.
 As with the electrostatic field, a homogeneous field form and the inhomogeneous field form are to be contrasted:
-  - Homogeneous flow field \\ e.g. conductor with constant cross-section
+  - In a **homogeneous current field** (e.g. conductor with constant cross-section) the field lines of the current run parallel. The equipotential surfaces are always perpendicular to each other because the potential energy of a charge depends only on its position along the path. \\ Additionally, the equipotential surfaces are equidistant due to the homogeneous geometry and the constant electric field, which causes the current. \\ Therefore the current $I = S \cdot A$ is constant \\ $\rightarrow$ the charge carriers have the same velocity $v$ \\ \\
-    - Field lines of the current run parallel
+  - In an **inhomogeneous current field** (e.g. a fuse or bottleneck in a wire) the field lines of the current are not parallel. the current $I = S \cdot A$ along the wire must also be constant, because the charge does not disappear or appear from nothing, but the area $A$ becomes smaller. \\ $\rightarrow$ thus the current density $S$ and the velocity $v$ at the bottleneck must become larger. \\ The equipotential surfaces are again perpendicular to the current density. The current does now show a compression at the bottleneck.
-    - equipotential surfaces
-      - are always perpendicular to each other, because the potential energy of a charge depends only on its position along the path
-      - are equidistant due to the constant electric field causing the current and the homogeneous geometry
-    - Current $I = S \cdot A$ is constant $\rightarrow$ charge carriers have the same velocity $v$
-  - Inhomogeneous current field \\fuse or taper in wire
-    - Field lines of the current are not parallel
-    - Current $I = S \cdot A$ must also be constant, because the charge does not disappear / is generated, but the area $A$ becomes smaller \$ $\rightarrow$ thus the current density $S$ and the velocity $v$ at the constriction must become larger
-    - Equipotential surfaces
-      - are again perpendicular to this.
-      - now show a compression at the constriction
-But why is there a compression of the equipotential surfaces at the bottleneck? This means that there is a large potential difference, i.e. a large voltage. So this already sounds a little bit plausible. This will be looked at in more detail in a moment.
+But why is there a compression of the __equipotential surfaces__ at a bottleneck (see <imgref imageNo03>)? \\
+This means that there is a large potential difference, i.e. a large voltage. So, this already sounds a little bit plausible. This will be looked at in more detail in a moment.
-The current density was determined only for a constant cross-sectional area $A$, through which a homogeneous current, thus also a homogeneous flow field, passes at right angles. Now, however, a general approach for the electric current strength is to be found.
+<WRAP> <imgcaption imageNo03 | Field Lines and equipotential Surfaces of the electric Current Field> </imgcaption> <WRAP> {{drawio>fieldlineelectricflowfield.svg}} \\ </WRAP>
-For this purpose, instead of a constant current density $S$ over a vertical, straight cross-sectional area $A$, a varying current density $S(A)$ over many small partial areas $dA$ is considered. Thus, if the subareas are sufficiently small, a constant current density over the subarea can again be obtained. It then becomes from
+The current density was determined only for a constant cross-sectional area $A$, through which a homogeneous current - thus also a homogeneous current field - passes perpendicularly. Now, however, a general approach for the electric current strength has to be found.
-\begin{align*}
+For this purpose, instead of a constant current density $S$ over a vertical, straight cross-sectional area $A$, a varying current density $S(A)$ over many small partial areas ${\rm d}A$ is considered. Thus, if the subareas are sufficiently small, a constant current density over the subarea can again be obtained. It then becomes
-I = S \cdot A \rightarrow dI = S \cdot dA
-\end{align*}
+\begin{align*} I = S \cdot A \rightarrow {\rm d}I = S \cdot {\rm d}A \end{align*}
 The total current over a larger area $A$ is thus given as:
-\begin{align*}
+\begin{align*} I = \int {\rm d}I = \iint_A S \cdot {\rm d}A \end{align*}
-I = \int dI = \iint_A S \cdot dA
-\end{align*}
-But what was not considered here: The chosen area $A$ does not necessarily have to be perpendicular to the current density $S$. To take this into account, the (partial) surface normal vector $d\vec{A}$ can be used. If only the part of the current density $\vec{S}$ is to be considered which acts in the direction of $d\vec{A}$, this can be determined via the scalar product:
+But what was not considered here: The chosen area $A$ does not necessarily have to be perpendicular to the current density $S$. To take this into account, the (partial) surface normal vector ${\rm d}\vec{A}$ can be used. If only the part of the current density $\vec{S}$ is to be considered which acts in the direction of $d\vec{A}$, this can be determined via the scalar product:
-\begin{align}
+\begin{align} I = \int {\rm d}I = \iint_A \vec{S} \cdot {\rm d}\vec{A} \end{align}
-I = \int dI = \iint_A \vec{S} \cdot d\vec{A}
-\end{align}
 This represents the integral notation of the electric current strength. This can be used to determine the current strength in any field.
+The current $I$ is the flux of the current density vector $\vec{S}$.
 ==== General Material Law ====
-For a "pragmatic" derivation of the general material law for the current density, the compression of the equipotential surfaces at the constriction shall be discussed again. Between two equipotential surfaces there is a voltage difference $\Delta U$. If one chooses this sufficiently small, the transition of $\Delta U \rightarrow dU$ results again. However, the same current $I$ must always flow through the potential surfaces in the conductor. Ohm's law then gives the partial resistance $dR$ between the two equipotential surfaces:
+For a "pragmatic" derivation of the general material law for the current density, the compression of the equipotential surfaces at the constriction shall be discussed again. Between two equipotential surfaces, there is a voltage difference $\Delta U$. If one chooses this sufficiently small, the transition of $\Delta U \rightarrow {\rm d}U$ results again. However, the same current $I$ must always flow through the potential surfaces in the conductor. Ohm's law then gives the partial resistance ${\rm d}R$ between the two equipotential surfaces:
-\begin{align*}
+\begin{align*} {\rm d}U = I \cdot {\rm d}R \tag{2.1.1} \end{align*}
-dU = I \cdot dR \tag{2.1.1}
-\end{align*}
-The individual quantities are now to be considered for infinitesimally small parts.
+The individual quantities are now to be considered for infinitesimally small parts. For $I$ an equation about a density - the current density - was already found:
-For $I$ an equation about a density - the current density - was already found:
-\begin{align}
+\begin{align*} I = S \cdot A \tag{2.1.2} \end{align*}
-I = S \cdot A \tag{2.1.2}
-\end{align}
 But also $R$ has already been expressed by a "density" - the resistivity $\varrho$: $ R = \varrho \cdot {{l}\over{A}}$
-If a conductor made of the same material is considered, the resistivity $\varrho$ is the same everywhere. But if there is now a partial element $ds$ along the conductor, where the cross-section $A$ is smaller, the resistance $dR$ of this partial element also changes. The partial resistance is then:
+If a conductor made of the same material is considered, the resistivity $\varrho$ is the same everywhere. But if there is now a partial element ${\rm d}s$ along the conductor, where the cross-section $A$ is smaller, the resistance ${\rm d}R$ of this partial element also changes. The partial resistance is then:
-\begin{align*}
+\begin{align*} {\rm d}R = \varrho \cdot {{{\rm d}s}\over{A}} \tag{2.1.3} \end{align*}
-dR = \varrho \cdot {{ds}\over{A}} \tag{2.1.3}
-\end{align}
-**In concrete terms, this means for the bottleneck: The resistance increases at the bottleneck. Thus the voltage drop also increases there. Thus there are also more equipotential surfaces there. **
+In concrete terms, this means for the bottleneck: **The resistance increases at the bottleneck. Thus the voltage drop also increases there. Thus there are also more equipotential surfaces there. **
-The enrichment of the equipotential surfaces would be solved with it. Interestingly, however, with the thought model now also for a __homogeneous body__ the general material law can be explained.
+This solves the question of why there is a compression of the equipotential surfaces at the bottleneck (see <imgref imageNo02 >). Interestingly, the thought model can now also for a __homogeneous body__  explain the general material law. To do this, one inserts equation $(2.1.2)$ and $(2.1.3)$ into $(2.1.1)$. Then it follows:
-To do this, one inserts equation $(2.1.2)$ and $(2.1.3)$ into $(2.1.1)$.
-Then it follows:
 \begin{align*}
-dU = I \cdot dR = S \cdot A \cdot \varrho \cdot {{ds}\over{{A}}} = \varrho \cdot S \cdot ds \\
+{\rm d}U = I \cdot {\rm d}R
+         = S \cdot A \cdot \varrho \cdot {{{\rm d}s}\over{{A}}}
+         = \varrho \cdot S \cdot {\rm d}s \\
 \end{align*}
 If now the electric field strength is inserted as $E={{dU}\over{ds}}$, one obtains:
 \begin{align*}
-E = {{dU}\over{ds}} = \varrho \cdot S
+E = {{{\rm d}U}\over{{\rm d}s}}
+  = \varrho \cdot S
 \end{align*}
-With a more detailed (and mathematically correct) derivation you get:
+With a more detailed (and mathematically correct) derivation, you get:
-\begin{align}
+\begin{align*}
 \boxed{\vec{E} = \varrho \cdot \vec{S} }
-\end{align}
+\end{align*}
-This equation expresses how the electric field $\vec{E}$ and the (steady-state) electric flow field $\vec{S}$ are related: both point in the same direction. For a given electric field $\vec{E}$ in a homogeneous conductor, the smaller the resistivity $\varrho$, the larger the flow field $\vec{S}$.
+This equation expresses how the electric field $\vec{E}$ and the (stationary) current density $\vec{S}$ are related: both point in the same direction. For a given electric field $\vec{E}$ in a homogeneous conductor, the smaller the resistivity $\varrho$, the larger the current density $\vec{S}$.
-~~PAGEBREAK~~~CLEARFIX~~~
+~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~
-==== Task ====
+==== Tasks ====
 <panel type="info" title="Task 2.1.1 calculated exercises in video"> <WRAP group><WRAP column 2%>{{fa>pencil?32}}</WRAP><WRAP column 92%>
 Examples of electrical current density
-{{youtube>9vLvzM9eGxY}}
-</WRAP></WRAP></panel>
+{{youtube>Q17V1unhpEU}}
+</WRAP></WRAP></panel>
 <panel type="info" title="Task 2.1.2 Electron velocity in copper"> <WRAP group><WRAP column 2%>{{fa>pencil?32}}</WRAP><WRAP column 92%>
-In a conductor made of copper with cross-sectional area $A$, the current $I = 20A$ flows. \\
+A current of $I = 2~{\rm A}$ flows in a conductor made of copper with cross-sectional area $A$. \\ The electron density in copper is $n_{\rm e}({\rm Cu})=8.47 \cdot 10^{19} ~{\rm {1}\over{mm^3}}$ and the magnitude of the elementary charge $e_0 = 1.602 \cdot 10^{-19} ~{\rm As}$
-Let further be given the electron density $n_e(Cu)=8.47 \cdot 10^{19} {{1}\over{mm^3}}$ and the magnitude of the elementary charge $e_0 = 1.602 \cdot 10^{-19} As$
-  - What is the mean flow velocity $v_{e,1}$ of electrons when the cross-sectional area of the conductor is $A = 1.5mm^2$?
+  - What is the average electron velocity $v_{\rm e,1}$ of electrons when the cross-sectional area of the conductor is $A = 1.5~{\rm mm}^2$?
-  - What is the mean flow velocity $v_{e,1}$ of the electrons when the cross-sectional area of the conductor is $A = 1.0mm^2$?
+  - What is the average electron velocity $v_{\rm e,1}$ of electrons when the cross-sectional area of the conductor is $A = 1.0~{\rm mm}^2$?
 </WRAP></WRAP></panel>
+<panel type="info" title="Task 2.1.3 Electron velocity in Semiconductors"> <WRAP group><WRAP column 2%>{{fa>pencil?32}}</WRAP><WRAP column 92%>
-=====2.2 Gaussian flow field theorem =====
+Similar to task 2.1.2 a current of $I = 2~{\rm A}$ shall flow through a cross-sectional area $A = 1.5~{\rm mm}^2$ of semiconductors. \\
+(magnitude of the elementary charge $e_0 = 1.602 \cdot 10^{-19} ~{\rm As}$)
+  - What is the average electron velocity $v_{\rm e,1}$ of electrons for undoped silicon (electron density $n_{\rm e}({\rm Si})=9.65 \cdot 10^{9} ~{\rm {1}\over{cm^3}}$ at room temperature)?
+  - The electron density of doped silicon $n_{\rm e}(Si\; doped)$ is (mainly) given by the number of dopant atoms per volume. The doping shall provide 1 donator atom per $10^7$ silicon atoms (here: one donator atom shall release one electron). The molar volume of silicon is $12 \cdot 10^{-6}~{\rm {m^3}\over{mol}}$ with $6.022 \cdot 10^{23}$ silicon atoms per ${\rm mol}$. What is the average electron velocity $v_{\rm e,1}$ of electrons for doped silicon?
+</WRAP></WRAP></panel>
+===== 2.2 Gauss's Law for Current Density =====
 <callout>
-==== Targets ====
+==== Goals ====
 After this lesson, you should:
   - know which quantities are comparable for the electrostatic field and the flow field.
-  - be able to explain the displacement current on the basis of enveloping surfaces.
+  - be able to explain the displacement current based on enveloping surfaces.
   - understand how current can flow "through" a capacitor.
 </callout>
+On can now compare the formulas of the current density with the formulas of the displacement flux density. Interestingly, these have a similar structure (see <imgref ImgNr06 >). However, Gauss's law for the current density was not considered up to now.
+<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr06 | Comparison of the electrostatic Field and Current Density> </imgcaption> {{drawio>ComparisonElField.svg}} </WRAP>
+Gauss's law of the current density shall be analyzed now. <imgref ImgNr07> a) shows a closed surface around a part of the wire. Since the charge has to be conserved, the incoming current $I_{\rm in}= S_{\rm in}\cdot A_{\rm in}= {{{\rm d}Q_{\rm in}}\over{{\rm d}t}}$ must be equal to the outgoing current $I_{\rm out}= S_{\rm out}\cdot A_{\rm out}= {{{\rm d}Q_{\rm out}}\over{{\rm d}t}}$ (<imgref ImgNr07> b) ). This is also true for any arbitrary current density going through the surface, see <imgref ImgNr07> c).
-==== Video ====
+<WRAP 50%> <imgcaption ImgNr07 | Gauss's Law for Current Density> </imgcaption> {{drawio>GaussCurrent.svg}} \\ {{drawio>GaussCurrent2.svg}}</WRAP>
-Why does an electron flow through a capacitor?
+Thus, for the integral of current density over the closed surface $A$ it must apply that:
-{{youtube>8tXXlI0gHVk}}
+\begin{align*}
+ I_{A_0} = \int_{A_0}  {\rm d}I = \iint_{A_0}  \vec{S} \cdot {\rm d}\vec{A} = 0
+\end{align*}
+But, how do the charges "flow" through a capacitor? Or more explicitly:
+What happens, when we look at a closed surface enveloping only one plate of the capacitor?
+There is only one incoming current. but no outgoing. Between the plate inside of the dielectrics there are no moving charges. How shall this work?
+<WRAP 50%> <imgcaption ImgNr08 | Gauss's Law for Current Density for a Capacitor Plate> </imgcaption> {{drawio>GaussCurrentCapacitor.svg}} </WRAP>
+For this, also the displacement flux density $D$ has taken into account. Since the ingoing charges get enriched (or depleted) on the capacitor plate, there will be a continuous increase of the displacement flux $\Psi$ (which is directly related to the charge $Q$). The ingoing current $I = {{{\rm d}Q}\over{{\rm d}t}}$ lead to a constant ${{{\rm d}\Psi}\over{{\rm d}t}}$ in the dielectric. As more displacement flux gets created, more charges will be induced on the other plate. This also leads to a current from/towards the other plate into the attached wire. Correspondingly, the change of the displacement flux behaves like a current!
+This current type within the dielectric material is called **displacement current**:
+\begin{align*}
+ I_{\rm d} = {{{\rm d}\Psi}\over{{\rm d}t}}
+\end{align*}
+This type of current is different from the previous concept of current, where charges are always continuously moving - the **conduction current**. The conduction current $I_{\rm c} = {{{\rm d}Q}\over{{\rm d}t}}$ obeys a fixed relationship to the voltage (e.g. the Ohm's Law for linear components). The displacement current does not obey such a relationship, due to the enrichment/depletion of charges. On a plate, the conduction current gets converted into displacement current, and vice versa.
+When speaking of electric current, one often covers both types of currents: $I = I_{\rm c} + I_{\rm d}$.
+There is also another important indication, which proves that the displacement current acts like a "charge-free" current: Any current generates a magnetic field around its way through the conductor. This is also true for the displacement current. Extrapolating this into fast alternating displacement flux density explains electromagnetic waves. There, the change in the electric field creates a changing magnetic field, which creates a changing electric field, which creates a changing electric field, which ...
+{{youtube>ppWBwZS4e7A}}
 ====== Tasks ======
 <panel type="info" title="Task 2.2.1 Simulation"> <WRAP group><WRAP column 2%>{{fa>pencil?32}}</WRAP><WRAP column 92%>
-In the simulation program of [[http://www.falstad.com/emstatic/|Falstad]] can be represented by equipotential surfaces, electric field strength and current density in different objects.
+The simulation program of [[http://www.falstad.com/emstatic-old/|Falstad]] can show equipotential surfaces, electric field strength, and current density in different objects.
   - Open the simulation program via the link
-  - Select: "Setup: Wire w/ Current" and "Show Current (j)".
+  - Select: ''Setup: Wire w/ Current'' and ''Show Current (j)''.
   - You will now see a finite conductor with charge carriers starting at the top end and arriving at the bottom end.
   - We now want to observe what happens when the conductor is tapered.
-    - To do this, select "Mouse = Clear Square". You can now use the left mouse button to remove parts from the conducting material. The aim should be, that in the middle of the Conductor there is only a one box wide line, on a length of at least 10 boxes. If you want to add conductive material again, this is possible with "Mouse = Add - Conductor".
+      - To do this, select ''Mouse = Clear Square''. You can now use the left mouse button to remove parts from the conducting material. The aim should be, that in the middle of the conductor, there is only a one-box wide line, on a length of at least 10 boxes. If you want to add conductive material again, this is possible with ''Mouse = Add - Conductor''.
-    - Consider why more equipotential lines are now accumulating as the conductor is tapered.
+      - Consider why more equipotential lines are now accumulating as the conductor is tapered.
-    - If you additionally draw in the E-field with "Show E/j", you will see that it is stronger along the taper. This can be checked with the slider "Brightness". Why is this?
+      - If you additionally draw in the E-field with ''Show E/j'', you will see that it is stronger along the taper. This can be checked with the slider ''Brightness''. Why is this?
-  - Select "Setup: Current in 2D 1", "Show E/rho/j". Why doesn't the cavity behave like a Faraday cage here?
+  - Select ''Setup: Current in 2D 1'', ''Show E/rho/j''. Why doesn't the cavity behave like a Faraday cage here?
 </WRAP></WRAP></panel>
+<panel type="info" title="Task 2.2.2 Water Resistor"> <WRAP group><WRAP column 2%>{{fa>pencil?32}}</WRAP><WRAP column 92%>
+In transformer stations sometimes water resistors are used as {{wp>Liquid rheostat}}. In this resistor, the water works as a (poor) conductor which can handle a high power loss.
+The water resistor consists of a water basin. In the given basin two quadratic plates with the edge length of $l = 80 ~{\rm cm}$ are inserted with the distance $d$ between them.
+The resistivity of the water is $\rho = 0.25 ~\Omega {\rm m}$. The resistor shall dissipate the energy of $P = 4 ~{\rm kW}$ and shall exhibit a homogeneous current field.
+  - Calculate the required distance of the plates to get a current density of $S = 25 ~{\rm mA/cm^2}$
+  - What are the values of the current $I$ and the voltage $U$ at the resistor, such as the internal electric field strength $E$ in the setup?
+</WRAP></WRAP></panel>