Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| lab_electrical_engineering:6_opamps_2 [2026/06/17 10:58] – mexleadmin | lab_electrical_engineering:6_opamps_2 [2026/06/17 13:08] (current) – mexleadmin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | =====Rectangular-to-Triangle Signal Conversion - Integrator===== | + | <wrap onlyprint> |
| + | \\ | ||
| + | ====== Experiment 6: Operational Amplifier II - Pulse Width Modulation | ||
| + | * Circuits on the breadboard | ||
| + | * Integrator | ||
| + | * Non-inverting Schmitt trigger | ||
| + | * Triangle–square-wave generator | ||
| + | * Pulse-width modulation and control of a DC motor | ||
| - | ====Background Information==== | + | <wrap # |
| + | {{page> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| - | The operation of an OPV in the linear operating range can be enforced by means of circuitry by feeding back the output signal, i.e., returning it to the inverting input (- input). In the circuit shown, the negative feedback is provided by a capacitor.\\ | + | <wrap # |
| - | \\ | + | {{page> |
| - | \\ | + | {{page> |
| - | <wrap left> {{drawio>mexlefirst_intern: | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | Analysis of the circuit: | + | |
| - | Negative feedback | + | </ |
| - | $\Rightarrow u_\mathrm{d} | + | ===== Preparation |
| - | + | ||
| - | $i_R=i_C$ (because OPV input current $i_\mathrm{n} | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $u_\mathrm{a}=-u_C=-\frac{1}{C}\int i_\mathrm{C}\, | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | The integrated input voltage appears at the output. The product of resistance and capacitance has the character of a time constant: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $T_\mathrm{i}=RC$\\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | <wrap left> {{drawio> | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | The figure shows the output voltage of an integrator with a square wave voltage at the input. The output voltage at the start $u_\mathrm{a}(t=0)$ depends on the charge state of the capacitor when switched on.\\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ====Experimental Tasks==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | To analyze the behavior of the integrator, the following circuit is used:\\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | <wrap left> | + | |
| - | {{drawio> | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | __Supply voltages (from power supply unit):__\\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | $UCC=+3~V, UEE~=-3~V$\\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | __Values of the components used:__\\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | $R1.3=10~kΩ, | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | \\ | + | |
| - | - Calculate the time constant $T_\mathrm{i}$ of the integrator from the given values. | + | |
| - | - Assumption: the capacitor is initially uncharged. A voltage $u_\mathrm{e}=+3~V$ is applied to the input. How long does it take for the output voltage to reach $u_\mathrm{Tr}=-3~V$? | + | |
| - | - Roughly sketch the voltage curves that you expect at the TR output when you apply a bipolar square wave signal to the $u_\mathrm{e}$ input.\\ \\ **Output TR**\\ \\ <wrap left> | + | |
| - | - Build the circuit on the MEXLE-board. **Please use the level shifting circuit at the input of the circuit.** Make sure that the jumper at the bottom of the op-amp is set to the left so that the op-amp is supplied with +/- 3V. Connect channel 1 on the oscilloscope to $U_\mathrm{e}$ and channel 2 to TR. Connect the function generator to the $U_\mathrm{e}$ input. Set to square wave (bipolar) with a frequency of 3kHz and a voltage of 3 V (amplitude). Switch on the power supply. Take a photo of the oscilloscope screen image. \\ \\ \\ **C1 = 10 nF, f = 3 kHz**\\ \\ <wrap left> | + | |
| - | - Compare your measurement with the calculation from part 2 and the forecast from part 3. Explain your result. | + | |
| - | ====Test Questions | + | For this experiment, you should be able to apply and explain the following concepts: |
| - | | + | |
| + | | ||
| + | - output-voltage waveform $U_A$ of the inverting integrator (inverting integrator) for different input voltages $U_E$, e.g. | ||
| + | - DC voltage | ||
| + | - square-wave voltage | ||
| + | - arbitrary voltage waveform | ||
| + | - integration time constant of the inverting integrator | ||
| + | - Schmitt trigger | ||
| + | - difference in feedback compared to the inverting integrator | ||
| + | - idealized relationship between $U_E$ and $U_A$ | ||
| + | - idealized line diagram: $U_E$ and $U_A$ as a function of time | ||
| + | - switching thresholds | ||
| + | - threshold voltage | ||
| + | - hysteresis | ||
| + | - real behavior: output "in saturation" | ||
| + | - structure of the triangle–square-wave generator | ||