And again:
For checking your understanding please do the following exercise:
Quick sketches: single charge, dipole, parallel plates. Poll for rules of field lines and equipotentials.
Move charges, toggle equipotentials, and compare line density to indicated $|\vec{E}|$; vary plate spacing $d$ and discuss $E=\frac{U}{d}$ (units: $\rm V/m$).
Mini-worksheet: sketch fields for two like charges and a dipole; mark where $|\vec{E}|$ is largest; short calc: $|\vec{E}|$ at $r$ from a charge.
Summary map linking field lines ↔ equipotentials ↔ potential difference as bridge to capacitors and energy (next blocks).
In previous chapters, only single charges (e.g., $Q_1$, $Q_2$) were considered.
$\rho_l = {{Q}\over{l}}$
or, in the case of different charge densities on subsections:
$\rho_l = {{\Delta Q}\over{\Delta l}} \rightarrow \rho_l(l)={{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}l}} Q(l)$
$\rho_A = {{Q}\over{A}}$
or if there are different charge densities on partial surfaces:
$\rho_A = {{\Delta Q}\over{\Delta A}} \rightarrow \rho_A(A) ={{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}A}} Q(A)={{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}x}}{{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}y}} Q(A)$
$\rho_V = {{Q}\over{V}}$
or for different charge density in partial volumes:
$\rho_V = {{\Delta Q}\over{\Delta V}} \rightarrow \rho_V(V) ={{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}V}} Q(V)={{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}x}}{{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}y}}{{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}z}} Q(V)$
Electric field lines result from the (fictitious) path of a sample charge. Thus, also electric field lines of several charges can be determined. However, these also result from a superposition of the individual effects - i.e., electric field - at a measuring point $P$.
The superposition is sketched in figure 4: Two charges $Q_1$ and $Q_2$ act on the test charge $q$ with the forces $F_1$ and $F_2$. Depending on the positions and charges, the forces vary, and so does the resulting force. The simulation also shows a single field line.
For a full picture of the field lines between charges, one has to start with a single charge. The in- and outgoing lines on this charge are drawn equidistant from the charge. This is also true for the situation with multiple charges. However, there, the lines are not necessarily run radially anymore. The test charge is influenced by all the single charges, and therefore, the field lines can get bent.
In figure 3 the field lines are shown. The additional “equipotential lines” will be discussed later and can be deactivated by clearing the checkmark Show Equipotentials.
Try the following in the simulation:
Add » Add Point Charge.delete
There are two different types of fields:
In homogeneous fields, magnitude and direction are constant throughout the field range. This field form is idealized to exist within plate capacitors. e.g., in the plate capacitor (figure 5), or the vicinity of widely extended bodies.
Here, the electric field $E$ is given as: $E = {{U}\over{d}}$
For inhomogeneous fields, the magnitude and/or direction of the electric field changes from place to place. This is the rule in real systems, even the field of a point charge is inhomogeneous (figure 6).
For the given example of a cylindrical configuration woth tha radius $r$, the electric field $E$ is given as: $E \\sim {{1}\over{r}}$
In the first thought experiment, a conductor (e.g., a metal plate) is charged, see figure 7.
The additional charges create an electric field. Thus, a resultant force acts on each charge.
The causes of this force are the electric fields of the surrounding electric charges. So the charges repel and move apart.
Fig. 7: Viewing a charged metal ball
The movement of the charge continues until a force equilibrium is reached.
In this steady state, there is no longer a resultant force acting on the single charge.
In figure 7 this can be seen on the right: the repulsive forces of the charges are counteracted by the attractive forces of the atomic shells.
Results:
Point discharge is a well-known phenomenon, which can be seen as corona discharge on power lines (where it also creates the summing sound) or is used in spark plugs. The phenomenon addresses the effect that there are many more charges at the corners and edges of a conductor. But why is that so? For this, it is feasible to try to calculate the charge density at different spots of a conductor.
In the figure 9 an example of a charged and “pointy” conductor is given in image (a). The surface of the conductor is always at the same potential. To cope with this complex shape and the desired charge density, the following path shall be taken:
In Block03 we had a short look on conductivity of matter.
Here, we want to have again a look onto isolators.
Given is an arrangement of electric charges located in a vacuum (see picture on the right).
The charges have the following values:
$Q_1=7 ~\rm{µC}$ (point charge)
$Q_2=5 ~\rm{µC}$ (point charge)
$Q_3=0 ~\rm{C}$ (infinitely extended surface charge)
$\varepsilon_0=8.854\cdot 10^{-12} ~\rm{F/m}$ , $\varepsilon_r=1$
1. calculate the magnitude of the force of $Q_2$ on $Q_1$, without the force effect of $Q_3$.
2. is this force attractive or repulsive?
Now let $Q_2=0$ and the surface charge $Q_3$ be designed in such a way that a homogeneous electric field with $E_3=100 ~\rm{kV/m}$ results.
What force (magnitude) now results on $Q_1$?
Given is an arrangement of electric charges located in a vacuum (see picture on the right).
The charges have the following values:
$Q_1=5 ~\rm{µC}$ (point charge)
$Q_2=-10 ~\rm{µC}$ (point charge)
$Q_3= 0 ~\rm{C}$ (infinitely extended surface charge)
$\varepsilon_0=8.854\cdot 10^{-12} ~\rm{F/m}$ , $\varepsilon_r=1$
1. calculate the magnitude of the force of $Q_2$ on $Q_1$, without the force effect of $Q_3$.
2. is this force attractive or repulsive?
Now let $Q_2=0$ and the surface charge $Q_3$ be designed in such a way that a homogeneous electric field with $E_3=500 ~\rm{kV/m}$ results.
What force (magnitude) now results on $Q_1$?
Given is an arrangement of electric charges located in a vacuum (see picture on the right).
The charges have the following values:
$Q_1= 2 ~\rm{µC}$ (point charge)
$Q_2=-4 ~\rm{µC}$ (point charge)
$Q_3= 0 ~\rm{C}$ (infinitely extended surface charge)
$\varepsilon_0=8.854\cdot 10^{-12} ~\rm{F/m}$ , $\varepsilon_r=1$
1. calculate the magnitude of the force of $Q_2$ on $Q_1$, without the force effect of $Q_3$.
2. is this force attractive or repulsive?
Now let $Q_2=0$ and the surface charge $Q_3$ be designed in such a way that a homogeneous electric field with $E_3=100 ~\rm{kV/m}$ results.
What force (magnitude) now results on $Q_1$?
Field lines of various extended charged objects