Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
| dummy2 [2026/01/12 08:43] – mexleadmin | dummy2 [2026/05/16 21:52] (current) – mexleadmin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== | + | ====== |
| - | asdasdasd | + | ===== Learning objectives ===== |
| - | {{imapmloc>CON1|Asia}} | + | <callout> |
| + | After this 90-minute block, you can | ||
| - | {{imapmarkers> | + | * explain how two coils can exchange energy by a common magnetic flux \(\Phi\). |
| - | [[https:// | + | * use the ideal transformer equations |
| - | [[https:// | + | \[ |
| - | [[https:// | + | \begin{align*} |
| - | [[https:// | + | \frac{\underline{U}_1}{\underline{U}_2}=\frac{N_1}{N_2}=n, |
| - | [[https:// | + | \qquad |
| - | [[|Notaus-Knopf @ 1505,280,50]] | + | \frac{\underline{I}_1}{\underline{I}_2}=-\frac{1}{n} |
| - | [[|Hauptschalter @ 1550,190, | + | \end{align*} |
| - | [[https:// | + | \] |
| - | [[|Schalter für die 4 Steckdosen @ 2140,190,2210, | + | with a clear sign convention. |
| - | [[https:// | + | * explain mutual inductance \(M\) using flux linkage and magnetic reluctance \(R_{\rm m}\). |
| - | [[https:// | + | * distinguish **main flux**, **leakage flux**, **copper losses**, and **iron losses** in a real transformer. |
| - | [[|Leiterplattenhalter für Platinen @ 790,720, | + | * refer secondary-side quantities to the primary side using \( \underline{U}' |
| - | [[https:// | + | * interpret the no-load test and short-circuit test using the reduced equivalent circuit. |
| - | [[|Lötabsaugung @ 1050, | + | * calculate short-circuit voltage \(u_{\rm k}\), continuous short-circuit current \(I_{\rm 1k}\), and an estimated initial peak short-circuit current. |
| - | [[|Schalter für die Lötabsaugung @ 400, | + | * connect transformer parameters to engineering applications in mechatronics and robotics, such as isolated power supplies, motor current measurement, welding transformers, and safety transformers. |
| - | [[|Schubladen mit Tastköpfe, DMM, Messleitungen, | + | </callout> |
| - | [[|Vorschriften zum Arbeitsplatz und Sicherheitshinweise @ 180, | + | |
| - | {{< | + | ===== Preparation at Home ===== |
| - | {{imapmloc>CON1|Asia}} | + | Well, again |
| + | |||
| + | * read through the present chapter and write down anything you did not understand. | ||
| + | * Repeat the EEE1 ideas of [[: | ||
| + | * Repeat from EEE2 the use of [[block03|sinusoidal quantities]], | ||
| + | * For a deeper field-theory view, see also [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | For checking your understanding please do the quick checks in the exercise section. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 90-minute plan ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Warm-up (10 min):** | ||
| + | * Where do transformers occur in robots and automation systems? | ||
| + | * Recall: Faraday induction from EEE1 — a changing magnetic flux induces a voltage. | ||
| + | * Recall: in AC analysis we use RMS phasors \(\underline{U}\), \(\underline{I}\), and impedances \(j\omega L\). | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Core concepts and derivations (55 min):** | ||
| + | * Ideal transformer: | ||
| + | * Mutual inductance: how flux from one coil links another coil. | ||
| + | * Magnetic coupling with reluctance \(R_{\rm m}\). | ||
| + | * Real transformer: | ||
| + | * Reduced equivalent circuit: refer secondary quantities to the primary side. | ||
| + | * No-load and short-circuit operation: what can be measured, what can be neglected. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Practice (20 min):** | ||
| + | * Quick ratio calculations for step-up and step-down transformers. | ||
| + | * Unit checks for \(j\omega L\), \(j\omega N\Phi\), and \(u_{\rm k}\). | ||
| + | * Short-circuit current calculation for a transformer used in an actuator supply. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Wrap-up (5 min):** | ||
| + | * Summary box: ideal transformer, | ||
| + | * Common pitfalls checklist. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Conceptual overview ===== | ||
| + | <callout icon=" | ||
| + | * A transformer is **not** a DC component. It needs a changing magnetic flux. In normal operation this is usually a sinusoidal flux created by AC voltage. | ||
| + | * The transformer does not “create power”. Ideally, it trades voltage for current: | ||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \text{higher voltage} \quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad \text{lower current} | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | * The link between the two windings is the magnetic field in the iron core. This continues directly from EEE1: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * Mutual inductance \(M\) measures how strongly one coil “notices” the changing current in another coil. | ||
| + | * A real transformer is almost ideal, but not quite: | ||
| + | * \(R_1, R_2\): copper losses in the windings. | ||
| + | * \(L_{1\sigma}, L_{2\sigma}\): leakage flux that does not couple both windings. | ||
| + | * \(R_{\rm Fe}\): iron losses in the core. | ||
| + | * \(L_{\rm H}\): main magnetizing inductance needed to create the main flux. | ||
| + | * In engineering, | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Core content ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== From EEE1 induction to an AC transformer ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | In EEE1 we considered magnetic flux \(\Phi\), flux linkage \(\Psi\), and induction. | ||
| + | For one coil with \(N\) turns the flux linkage is | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \Psi = N\Phi . | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Faraday' | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | u(t)=\frac{{\rm d}\Psi}{{\rm d}t}=N\frac{{\rm d}\Phi}{{\rm d}t}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | In sinusoidal steady state this becomes the phasor equation | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \underline{U}=j\omega\underline{\Psi}=j\omega N\underline{\Phi}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is the starting point for the transformer. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | {{drawio> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <callout type=" | ||
| + | **Unit check for induced voltage** | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \underline{U}=j\omega N\underline{\Phi} | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | with | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | [\omega\Phi]={\rm s}^{-1}\cdot {\rm Wb} | ||
| + | ={\rm s}^{-1}\cdot {\rm V\,s} | ||
| + | ={\rm V}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The number of turns \(N\) is dimensionless. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Mutual induction: the key idea before the transformer ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Before we look at the transformer, | ||
| + | |||
| + | <callout icon=" | ||
| + | A changing current in coil \(1\) creates a changing magnetic flux. | ||
| + | If part of this flux passes through coil \(2\), a voltage is induced in coil \(2\). | ||
| + | This is called **mutual induction**. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The flux created by coil \(1\) can be split into | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \Phi_{11} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \Phi_{21} | ||
| + | + | ||
| + | \Phi_{\rm S1}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | * \(\Phi_{11}\): | ||
| + | * \(\Phi_{21}\): | ||
| + | * \(\Phi_{\rm S1}\): stray or leakage flux that does **not** link coil \(2\). | ||
| + | |||
| + | The voltage induced in coil \(2\) is | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | u_{{\rm ind}, | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | -N_2\frac{{\rm d}\Phi_{21}}{{\rm d}t}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | Imagine two pistons connected by an air duct. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * If piston \(1\) moves, pressure travels through the duct and can move piston \(2\). | ||
| + | * If the duct is tight, piston \(2\) strongly feels piston \(1\). | ||
| + | * If the duct leaks, part of the pressure escapes and piston \(2\) feels less. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For coupled coils: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * the moving piston corresponds to changing current, | ||
| + | * the air duct corresponds to the magnetic path, | ||
| + | * leakage air corresponds to leakage flux, | ||
| + | * the strength of the coupling is described by mutual inductance \(M\). | ||
| + | |||
| + | The analogy is not perfect, but it helps to remember: **coupling is strong when much of the field of one coil also passes through the other coil.** | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Linked fluxes and mutual inductance ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | For a single coil we already know | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \Psi=L i . | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | For two coupled coils, each flux linkage can depend on both currents: | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \Psi_1 | ||
| + | &= | ||
| + | L_{11}i_1 | ||
| + | + | ||
| + | M_{12}i_2, | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | \Psi_2 | ||
| + | &= | ||
| + | M_{21}i_1 | ||
| + | + | ||
| + | L_{22}i_2. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | For most transformer calculations we use the symmetric case | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | M_{12}=M_{21}=M. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Then | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \boxed{ | ||
| + | \begin{pmatrix} | ||
| + | \Psi_1\\ | ||
| + | \Psi_2 | ||
| + | \end{pmatrix} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \begin{pmatrix} | ||
| + | L_{11} & M\\ | ||
| + | M & L_{22} | ||
| + | \end{pmatrix} | ||
| + | \begin{pmatrix} | ||
| + | i_1\\ | ||
| + | i_2 | ||
| + | \end{pmatrix} | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | and | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | M=k\sqrt{L_{11}L_{22}}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Here \(k\) is the coupling coefficient. | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ Coupling coefficient ^ Interpretation ^ Typical example ^ | ||
| + | | \(k=0\) | no useful flux from one coil links the other coil | coils far apart | | ||
| + | | \(0< | ||
| + | | \(k\approx 1\) | almost all useful flux links both coils | transformer with iron core | | ||
| + | | sign of \(k\) | depends on winding direction and reference arrows | dot convention | | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Polarity and the dot convention ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The sign of the mutual term depends on the winding direction and on the chosen current reference arrows. | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | **Rule of thumb** | ||
| + | |||
| + | * If both currents enter dotted terminals, the mutual fluxes support each other. | ||
| + | * If one current enters a dotted terminal and the other current leaves a dotted terminal, the mutual fluxes oppose each other. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP column half> | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP column half> | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | For positive coupling: | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | u_1 | ||
| + | &= | ||
| + | L_{11}\frac{{\rm d}i_1}{{\rm d}t} | ||
| + | + | ||
| + | M\frac{{\rm d}i_2}{{\rm d}t}, | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | u_2 | ||
| + | &= | ||
| + | M\frac{{\rm d}i_1}{{\rm d}t} | ||
| + | + | ||
| + | L_{22}\frac{{\rm d}i_2}{{\rm d}t}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | For negative coupling, the sign of \(M\) is negative in the chosen equation system. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | In wireless charging, the transmitter coil and receiver coil are separated by an air gap. | ||
| + | The coupling coefficient \(k\) is much smaller than in a transformer with an iron core. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If the receiver is misaligned, less flux from the transmitter passes through it. | ||
| + | Then \(M\) decreases, the induced voltage decreases, and the transmitted power decreases. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Magnetic coupling with reluctance only ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | We now use the magnetic circuit model from EEE1, but only with **magnetic reluctance** \(R_{\rm m}\). | ||
| + | No inverse magnetic quantity is needed here. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The magnetic voltage, also called magnetomotive force, is | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \Theta=N i . | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | For a magnetic path with reluctance \(R_{\rm m}\), Hopkinson' | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \Theta=R_{\rm m}\Phi | ||
| + | \qquad \Longleftrightarrow \qquad | ||
| + | \Phi=\frac{\Theta}{R_{\rm m}}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \text{electric: | ||
| + | \qquad | ||
| + | \text{magnetic: | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Electric voltage \(U\) pushes electric current \(I\) through resistance \(R\). | ||
| + | * Magnetic voltage \(\Theta=N i\) pushes magnetic flux \(\Phi\) through reluctance \(R_{\rm m}\). | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | For two windings on the same main magnetic path, the total magnetic voltage is | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \Theta | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | N_1\underline{I}_1 | ||
| + | + | ||
| + | N_2\underline{I}_2. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The main flux is | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \underline{\Phi} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{\Theta}{R_{\rm mH}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{N_1\underline{I}_1+N_2\underline{I}_2}{R_{\rm mH}}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The flux linkages are | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \underline{\Psi}_1 | ||
| + | &= | ||
| + | N_1\underline{\Phi} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{N_1^2}{R_{\rm mH}}\underline{I}_1 | ||
| + | + | ||
| + | \frac{N_1N_2}{R_{\rm mH}}\underline{I}_2, | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | \underline{\Psi}_2 | ||
| + | &= | ||
| + | N_2\underline{\Phi} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{N_1N_2}{R_{\rm mH}}\underline{I}_1 | ||
| + | + | ||
| + | \frac{N_2^2}{R_{\rm mH}}\underline{I}_2. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Therefore | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \boxed{ | ||
| + | L_{1{\rm H}}=\frac{N_1^2}{R_{\rm mH}} | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | \qquad | ||
| + | \boxed{ | ||
| + | L_{2{\rm H}}=\frac{N_2^2}{R_{\rm mH}} | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | \qquad | ||
| + | \boxed{ | ||
| + | M=\frac{N_1N_2}{R_{\rm mH}} | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | for an ideal common magnetic path. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <callout type=" | ||
| + | **Unit check for mutual inductance** | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | M=\frac{N_1N_2}{R_{\rm mH}} | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | with | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | [R_{\rm mH}] | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{{\rm A}}{{\rm Vs}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{1}{{\rm H}}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thus | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | [M]=\frac{1}{1/ | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Ideal single-phase transformer ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | For an ideal transformer we assume: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * both windings are linked by the same magnetic flux \(\Phi\), | ||
| + | * there is no leakage flux, | ||
| + | * there are no winding resistances, | ||
| + | * there are no iron losses, | ||
| + | * the transformer stores no net energy over one period. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Let \(N_1\) be the number of turns of the primary winding and \(N_2\) the number of turns of the secondary winding. | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \underline{\Psi}_1 &= N_1\underline{\Phi}, | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | \underline{U}_1 &= j\omega\underline{\Psi}_1 | ||
| + | = j\omega N_1\underline{\Phi}, | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | \underline{\Psi}_2 &= N_2\underline{\Phi}, | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | \underline{U}_2 &= j\omega\underline{\Psi}_2 | ||
| + | = j\omega N_2\underline{\Phi}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Dividing the two voltage equations gives the **turns ratio** | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \boxed{ | ||
| + | \frac{\underline{U}_1}{\underline{U}_2} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{N_1}{N_2} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | n | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | with | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | n=\frac{N_1}{N_2}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP column 100%> | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | With the indicated reference arrows and a lossless transformer: | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \underline{U}_1\underline{I}_1+\underline{U}_2\underline{I}_2=0 | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | and therefore | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \boxed{ | ||
| + | \frac{\underline{I}_1}{\underline{I}_2} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | -\frac{\underline{U}_2}{\underline{U}_1} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | -\frac{N_2}{N_1} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | -\frac{1}{n} | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The minus sign is not a “loss”. It is caused by the chosen current arrows. The primary side absorbs power while the secondary side delivers power to the load. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | * If \(N_2< | ||
| + | * At the same time, the secondary current can be higher: \(I_2> | ||
| + | * This is useful in robotics power supplies: a mains-side transformer or isolated converter stage may reduce voltage while increasing available current for actuators. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Example: step-down transformer for a robot controller ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | A transformer has \(N_1=800\) turns and \(N_2=80\) turns. | ||
| + | The primary RMS voltage is \(U_1=230~{\rm V}\). | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | n &= \frac{N_1}{N_2} | ||
| + | = \frac{800}{80} | ||
| + | =10, | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | U_2 &= \frac{U_1}{n} | ||
| + | = \frac{230~{\rm V}}{10} | ||
| + | =23~{\rm V}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | If the secondary side supplies \(I_2=4~{\rm A}\), the ideal primary current magnitude is | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | I_1 &= \frac{I_2}{n} | ||
| + | = \frac{4~{\rm A}}{10} | ||
| + | =0.4~{\rm A}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The apparent power is equal on both sides: | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | S_1 &= U_1I_1=230~{\rm V}\cdot 0.4~{\rm A}=92~{\rm VA}, | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | S_2 &= U_2I_2=23~{\rm V}\cdot 4~{\rm A}=92~{\rm VA}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Real transformer: | ||
| + | |||
| + | In a real transformer, | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The **main flux** \(\Phi_{\rm H}\) links primary and secondary winding. | ||
| + | * The **primary leakage flux** \(\Phi_{1\sigma}\) mainly links only the primary winding. | ||
| + | * The **secondary leakage flux** \(\Phi_{2\sigma}\) mainly links only the secondary winding. | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | {{drawio> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The real flux linkage equations become | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \underline{\Psi}_1 | ||
| + | &= | ||
| + | L_1\underline{I}_1+M\underline{I}_2, | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | L_1& | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | \underline{\Psi}_2 | ||
| + | &= | ||
| + | L_2\underline{I}_2+M\underline{I}_1, | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | L_2& | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The winding resistances \(R_1\) and \(R_2\) cause copper losses: | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | P_{\rm Cu, | ||
| + | \qquad | ||
| + | P_{\rm Cu, | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | In the following formulas: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * blue terms: useful main magnetic coupling, | ||
| + | * orange terms: leakage flux, | ||
| + | * red terms: winding resistance and copper loss. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \underline{U}_1 | ||
| + | &= | ||
| + | \underbrace{{\color{red}{R_1\underline{I}_1}}}_{\text{primary copper drop}} | ||
| + | + | ||
| + | \underbrace{{\color{orange}{j\omega L_{1\sigma}\underline{I}_1}}}_{\text{primary leakage drop}} | ||
| + | + | ||
| + | \underbrace{{\color{blue}{j\omega L_{1{\rm H}}\underline{I}_1+j\omega M\underline{I}_2}}}_{\text{main magnetic coupling}}, | ||
| + | \\[6pt] | ||
| + | \underline{U}_2 | ||
| + | &= | ||
| + | \underbrace{{\color{red}{R_2\underline{I}_2}}}_{\text{secondary copper drop}} | ||
| + | + | ||
| + | \underbrace{{\color{orange}{j\omega L_{2\sigma}\underline{I}_2}}}_{\text{secondary leakage drop}} | ||
| + | + | ||
| + | \underbrace{{\color{blue}{j\omega L_{2{\rm H}}\underline{I}_2+j\omega M\underline{I}_1}}}_{\text{main magnetic coupling}}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | The blue terms are responsible for transformer action. | ||
| + | The orange terms are unwanted but unavoidable. | ||
| + | The red terms convert electrical energy into heat. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | With the leakage reactances | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | X_{1\sigma}=\omega L_{1\sigma}, | ||
| + | \qquad | ||
| + | X_{2\sigma}=\omega L_{2\sigma}, | ||
| + | \qquad | ||
| + | X_{\rm M}=\omega M | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | these equations can be represented by an equivalent circuit. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <callout type=" | ||
| + | **Unit check for leakage reactance** | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | X_{1\sigma}=\omega L_{1\sigma} | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | with | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | [\omega L]={\rm s}^{-1}\cdot{\rm H} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | {\rm s}^{-1}\cdot \frac{{\rm V\,s}}{{\rm A}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \Omega . | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | So \(jX_{1\sigma}\) is an impedance. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Why leakage flux matters in engineering ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | A robot axis may draw a high current during acceleration. | ||
| + | This high current produces a voltage drop at the leakage reactance and winding resistance of the transformer. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Possible effects: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * the secondary voltage decreases, | ||
| + | * a DC link after a rectifier may sag, | ||
| + | * controllers may reset due to undervoltage, | ||
| + | * cables and protective devices must withstand the fault current. | ||
| + | |||
| + | So leakage is not only a “field theory detail”. It directly affects the electrical behavior of the machine. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Reduced equivalent circuit referred to the primary side ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | For calculations it is convenient to move all secondary-side quantities to the primary side. This is called **referring** or **transforming** the secondary side to the primary side. | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \boxed{ | ||
| + | \underline{U}' | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | \qquad | ||
| + | \boxed{ | ||
| + | \underline{I}' | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The secondary resistance and leakage reactance are transformed by \(n^2\): | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \boxed{ | ||
| + | R' | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | \qquad | ||
| + | \boxed{ | ||
| + | X' | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | <callout type=" | ||
| + | **Unit check for referred resistance** | ||
| + | |||
| + | The turns ratio \(n\) is dimensionless. Therefore | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | [R' | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The value changes, but the unit does not. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | {{drawio> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the reduced equivalent circuit: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * \(R_1\) and \(R' | ||
| + | * \(jX_{1\sigma}\) and \(jX' | ||
| + | * \(jX_{1{\rm H}}\) models the magnetizing branch. | ||
| + | * \(R_{\rm Fe}\) is placed parallel to \(jX_{1{\rm H}}\) to model iron losses. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | Once all quantities are referred to one side, the transformer can be calculated like an AC network with impedances. | ||
| + | This uses the same method as [[block04|complex network calculation]]: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== No-load operation of the real transformer ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | No-load operation means that the secondary side is open: | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \underline{I}_2=0. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The primary side still draws a small no-load current \(\underline{I}_{10}\). This current has two parts: | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \underline{I}_{10} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \underline{I}_{\rm Fe} | ||
| + | + | ||
| + | \underline{I}_{\rm m}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | * \(\underline{I}_{\rm Fe}\): current through \(R_{\rm Fe}\), in phase with voltage, represents iron losses. | ||
| + | * \(\underline{I}_{\rm m}\): magnetizing current through \(jX_{1{\rm H}}\), approximately \(90^\circ\) lagging. | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | {{drawio> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The technical voltage ratio is often defined from the no-load voltages. Here it is denoted by \(\ddot{u}\): | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \ddot{u} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{\text{higher voltage}}{\text{lower voltage}} | ||
| + | \bigg|_{\rm no~load}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | For a step-down transformer: | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \ddot{u} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{U_{1{\rm N}}}{U_{20}}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Here \(U_{1{\rm N}}\) is the rated primary voltage and \(U_{20}\) is the open-circuit secondary voltage. | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | Because of real voltage drops and magnetizing effects, | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \ddot{u}\neq n, | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | but for many practical transformers | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \ddot{u}\approx n. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Short-circuit operation of the real transformer ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the short-circuit test, the secondary side is shorted: | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \underline{U}_2=0. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Because the required primary voltage is small, the magnetizing branch is often neglected: | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | X_{1{\rm H}}, | ||
| + | \gg | ||
| + | X' | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | This gives the short-circuit equivalent circuit with | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \boxed{ | ||
| + | R_{\rm k}=R_1+R' | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | \qquad | ||
| + | \boxed{ | ||
| + | X_{\rm k}=X_{1\sigma}+X' | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | and | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \underline{Z}_{\rm k} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | R_{\rm k}+jX_{\rm k}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | {{drawio> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | The **rated short-circuit voltage** \(U_{1{\rm k}}\) is the primary voltage that must be applied while the secondary side is shorted so that rated primary current \(I_{1{\rm N}}\) flows. | ||
| + | |||
| + | As a relative value: | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \boxed{ | ||
| + | u_{\rm k} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{U_{1{\rm k}}}{U_{1{\rm N}}}\cdot 100~\% | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Small \(u_{\rm k}\) means: small internal impedance and high possible fault current. | ||
| + | Large \(u_{\rm k}\) means: stronger current limitation and larger voltage drop under load. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The continuous short-circuit current for rated primary voltage is | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \boxed{ | ||
| + | I_{1{\rm k}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{U_{1{\rm N}}}{U_{1{\rm k}}}\cdot I_{1{\rm N}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | I_{1{\rm N}}\cdot \frac{100~\%}{u_{\rm k}} | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | where \(u_{\rm k}\) is inserted as a percentage value. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <callout type=" | ||
| + | **Unit check for \(u_{\rm k}\)** | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | u_{\rm k} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{U_{1{\rm k}}}{U_{1{\rm N}}}\cdot 100~\% | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | is dimensionless. It is usually stated in percent. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Why the first short-circuit peak can be about \(2.54 I_{1{\rm k}}\) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The RMS short-circuit current \(I_{1{\rm k}}\) does not describe the highest instantaneous current. | ||
| + | |||
| + | When a short circuit starts, the current can contain | ||
| + | |||
| + | * a sinusoidal AC component, and | ||
| + | * a decaying DC offset. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The worst case occurs when the fault starts at an unfavorable phase angle. Then the first current peak is larger than the normal sinusoidal peak \(\sqrt{2}I_{1{\rm k}}\). | ||
| + | |||
| + | A common engineering form is | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | i_{\rm p} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \kappa\sqrt{2}\, | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Here | ||
| + | |||
| + | * \(i_{\rm p}\) is the instantaneous peak short-circuit current, | ||
| + | * \(I'' | ||
| + | * \(\kappa\) is a peak factor depending mainly on the \(R/X\) ratio of the short-circuit impedance. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For a strongly inductive transformer short circuit, a practical approximation is | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \kappa\approx 1.8. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Then | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | i_{\rm p} | ||
| + | \approx | ||
| + | 1.8\cdot\sqrt{2}\cdot I_{1{\rm k}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 2.55\, | ||
| + | \approx | ||
| + | 2.54\, | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP column 100%> | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | The factor \(2.54\) is an engineering approximation for the first peak current. | ||
| + | It is **not** a universal transformer law. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For real protection design, use the applicable standard, manufacturer data, and the actual \(R/X\) ratio of the installation. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Real transformer under load ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Under load, the short-circuit equivalent circuit is often sufficient for engineering estimates. | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \underline{U}_{\rm k} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \left(R_{\rm k}+jX_{\rm k}\right)\underline{I}_1. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | This voltage drop is subtracted vectorially from the primary-side voltage relation. Therefore the secondary voltage depends on | ||
| + | |||
| + | * load current magnitude, | ||
| + | * load power factor, | ||
| + | * winding resistance, | ||
| + | * leakage reactance. | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | {{drawio> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | In a robot with motors, the supply transformer may show a lower output voltage during high acceleration because the motor currents increase. | ||
| + | The Kapp triangle helps estimate this voltage drop. This is important for: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * selecting transformer size, | ||
| + | * checking whether the DC link after a rectifier remains high enough, | ||
| + | * designing fuses and protective devices, | ||
| + | * avoiding undervoltage resets in control electronics. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Construction types and cooling ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Transformer behavior is influenced by construction. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP column half> | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | {{drawio> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP column half> | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | {{drawio> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Cooling types: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Dry-type transformer: | ||
| + | * **Oil transformer: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | * **Isolating transformer: | ||
| + | * **Control transformer: | ||
| + | * **Current transformer: | ||
| + | * **Welding transformer: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Typical technical transformer data ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ Name / use ^ Typical \(u_{\rm k}\) ^ Secondary voltage \(U_2\) ^ Important note ^ | ||
| + | | Power transformer | \(4\ldots 12~\%\) | application-dependent | low voltage drop, high fault currents possible | | ||
| + | | Isolating transformer | \(\approx 10~\%\) | max. \(250~{\rm V}\) | galvanic isolation for safety and measurement | | ||
| + | | Toy transformer | \(\approx 20~\%\) | max. \(24~{\rm V}\) | current limitation is desired | | ||
| + | | Doorbell transformer | \(\approx 40~\%\) | max. \(12~{\rm V}\), often several taps | simple robust low-voltage supply | | ||
| + | | Ignition transformer | \(\approx 100~\%\) | \(\leq 14~{\rm kV}\) | high voltage, limited current | | ||
| + | | Welding transformer | \(\approx 100~\%\) | max. \(70~{\rm V}\) | large current, strong current limitation | | ||
| + | | Voltage transformer | \(< | ||
| + | | Current transformer | \(100~\%\) | \(0~{\rm V}\) ideal secondary voltage | operate with low burden, approximately short-circuit | | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP column 100%> | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | A current transformer secondary must not be opened while primary current flows. | ||
| + | If the secondary circuit is open, the transformer tries to maintain the magnetic balance and can generate dangerous high voltages. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Exercises ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | A transformer has \(N_1=1200\) turns and \(N_2=300\) turns. | ||
| + | The primary RMS voltage is \(U_1=230~{\rm V}\). | ||
| + | The secondary side supplies a load current \(I_2=2.0~{\rm A}\). | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Calculate the turns ratio \(n\). | ||
| + | * Calculate the ideal secondary voltage \(U_2\). | ||
| + | * Calculate the magnitude of the ideal primary current \(I_1\). | ||
| + | * State whether this is a step-up or step-down transformer. | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | n=\frac{N_1}{N_2} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{1200}{300} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 4. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The secondary voltage is | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | U_2 | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{U_1}{n} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{230~{\rm V}}{4} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 57.5~{\rm V}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The primary current magnitude is | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | I_1 | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{I_2}{n} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{2.0~{\rm A}}{4} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 0.50~{\rm A}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Because \(U_2< | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | Two coils are wound on the same ideal magnetic core. | ||
| + | The main magnetic reluctance is | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | R_{\rm mH}=2.0\cdot 10^6~\frac{1}{\rm H}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The number of turns is \(N_1=500\) and \(N_2=100\). | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Calculate \(L_{1{\rm H}}\). | ||
| + | * Calculate \(L_{2{\rm H}}\). | ||
| + | * Calculate \(M\). | ||
| + | * Check whether the units are correct. | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | L_{1{\rm H}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{N_1^2}{R_{\rm mH}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{500^2}{2.0\cdot 10^6~1/{\rm H}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 0.125~{\rm H}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | L_{2{\rm H}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{N_2^2}{R_{\rm mH}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{100^2}{2.0\cdot 10^6~1/{\rm H}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 0.0050~{\rm H} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 5.0~{\rm mH}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | M | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{N_1N_2}{R_{\rm mH}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{500\cdot 100}{2.0\cdot 10^6~1/{\rm H}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 0.025~{\rm H} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 25~{\rm mH}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The unit is correct because \(1/(1/{\rm H})={\rm H}\). | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | A transformer has \(n=5\). | ||
| + | The secondary winding resistance is \(R_2=0.20~\Omega\) and the secondary leakage reactance is \(X_{2\sigma}=0.35~\Omega\). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Calculate the values \(R' | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | R'_2 | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | n^2R_2 | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 5^2\cdot 0.20~\Omega | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 25\cdot 0.20~\Omega | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 5.0~\Omega. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | X' | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | n^2X_{2\sigma} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 5^2\cdot 0.35~\Omega | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 25\cdot 0.35~\Omega | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 8.75~\Omega. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The unit remains \(\Omega\), because \(n\) is dimensionless. | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | A transformer has a rated primary current \(I_{1{\rm N}}=10~{\rm A}\) and a short-circuit voltage \(u_{\rm k}=5~\%\). | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Calculate the continuous short-circuit current \(I_{1{\rm k}}\) when rated primary voltage is applied. | ||
| + | * Estimate the initial peak short-circuit current \(i_{\rm p}\) using \(i_{\rm p}\approx 2.54 I_{1{\rm k}}\). | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | I_{1{\rm k}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | I_{1{\rm N}}\cdot \frac{100~\%}{u_{\rm k}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 10~{\rm A}\cdot \frac{100~\%}{5~\%} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 200~{\rm A}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | i_{\rm p} | ||
| + | \approx | ||
| + | 2.54\cdot I_{1{\rm k}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 2.54\cdot 200~{\rm A} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 508~{\rm A}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The short-circuit current is much larger than the rated current. Protection devices must be selected accordingly. | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | A single-phase transformer supplies an actuator driver. | ||
| + | Rated data and equivalent circuit data are: | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | U_{1{\rm N}}& | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | U_{2{\rm N}}& | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | I_{2{\rm N}}& | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | R_1& | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | X_{1\sigma}& | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | R_2& | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | X_{2\sigma}& | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Assume \(n=\frac{U_{1{\rm N}}}{U_{2{\rm N}}}\). The magnetizing branch is neglected for the loaded operating point. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Calculate \(n\). | ||
| + | * Refer \(R_2\) and \(X_{2\sigma}\) to the primary side. | ||
| + | * Calculate \(R_{\rm k}\) and \(X_{\rm k}\). | ||
| + | * Calculate the primary rated current magnitude \(I_{1{\rm N}}\) using the ideal current ratio. | ||
| + | * Estimate the magnitude of the internal voltage drop \(U_{\rm k}\approx |\underline{Z}_{\rm k}|I_{1{\rm N}}\). | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | The turns ratio is | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | n | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{U_{1{\rm N}}}{U_{2{\rm N}}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{230~{\rm V}}{23~{\rm V}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 10. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The secondary quantities referred to the primary side are | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | R'_2 | ||
| + | &= | ||
| + | n^2R_2 | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 10^2\cdot 0.012~\Omega | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 1.2~\Omega, | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | X' | ||
| + | &= | ||
| + | n^2X_{2\sigma} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 10^2\cdot 0.018~\Omega | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 1.8~\Omega. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Therefore | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | R_{\rm k} | ||
| + | &= | ||
| + | R_1+R' | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 1.2~\Omega+1.2~\Omega | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 2.4~\Omega, | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | X_{\rm k} | ||
| + | &= | ||
| + | X_{1\sigma}+X' | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 1.8~\Omega+1.8~\Omega | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 3.6~\Omega. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The primary current magnitude is | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | I_{1{\rm N}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{I_{2{\rm N}}}{n} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \frac{5.0~{\rm A}}{10} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 0.50~{\rm A}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The magnitude of the short-circuit impedance is | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | |\underline{Z}_{\rm k}| | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \sqrt{R_{\rm k}^2+X_{\rm k}^2} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | \sqrt{(2.4~\Omega)^2+(3.6~\Omega)^2} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 4.33~\Omega. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thus the internal voltage drop estimate is | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | U_{\rm k} | ||
| + | \approx | ||
| + | |\underline{Z}_{\rm k}|I_{1{\rm N}} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 4.33~\Omega\cdot 0.50~{\rm A} | ||
| + | = | ||
| + | 2.17~{\rm V}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is a primary-side voltage drop. On the secondary side it corresponds approximately to | ||
| + | |||
| + | \[ | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \frac{2.17~{\rm V}}{10}=0.217~{\rm V}. | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \] | ||
| + | |||
| + | For a \(23~{\rm V}\) actuator supply this is small but not zero. | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Common pitfalls ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Using a transformer with DC:** A transformer needs changing flux. With DC, after the switching transient, an ideal transformer no longer transfers voltage. A real transformer may overheat because the winding resistance limits the current only weakly. | ||
| + | * **Forgetting the current ratio sign:** The minus sign in \(\frac{\underline{I}_1}{\underline{I}_2}=-\frac{1}{n}\) comes from reference arrows. Do not interpret it as negative power loss. | ||
| + | * **Mixing peak values and RMS values:** In AC power and transformer ratings, \(U\) and \(I\) usually mean RMS values. Time functions are written \(u(t)\), \(i(t)\). Instantaneous short-circuit peaks are written here as \(i_{\rm p}\). | ||
| + | * **Confusing reluctance and resistance: | ||
| + | * **Confusing \(n\) and the technical no-load voltage ratio \(\ddot{u}\): | ||
| + | * **Forgetting the square when referring impedances: | ||
| + | * **Ignoring leakage reactance: | ||
| + | * **Treating \(u_{\rm k}\) as a voltage in volts:** \(u_{\rm k}\) is normally given in percent. Insert it consistently in formulas. | ||
| + | * **Using \(2.54\) as a universal law:** The first short-circuit peak depends on the \(R/X\) ratio and on the switching instant. The factor \(2.54\) is an approximation. | ||
| + | * **Opening a current transformer secondary: | ||
| + | * **Assuming ideal isolation at every frequency: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Embedded resources ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP column half> | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | Use this simulation to revisit the EEE1 idea that a changing magnetic flux induces voltage. | ||
| + | This is the physical basis of the transformer equations in this block. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{url> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP column half> | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | Use CircuitJS for qualitative experiments with coupled inductors and transformer circuits. | ||
| + | Suggested activity: search the example circuits for “transformer”, | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{url> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP column half> | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | Suggested experiment: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * build two coupled inductors, | ||
| + | * change the coupling coefficient, | ||
| + | * observe how the secondary voltage changes. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is especially useful for understanding the difference between an iron-core transformer and loosely coupled wireless charging coils. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP column half> | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | Relevant continuity pages: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~ | ||