Dies ist eine alte Version des Dokuments!

4. time-dependent magnetic Field

We have been considering electric fields created by fixed charge distributions and magnetic fields produced by constant currents, but electromagnetic phenomena are not restricted to these stationary situations. Most of the interesting applications of electromagnetism are, in fact, time-dependent. To investigate some of these applications, we now remove the time-independent assumption that we have been making and allow the fields to vary with time. In this and the next several chapters, you will see a wonderful symmetry in the behavior exhibited by time-varying electric and magnetic fields. Mathematically, this symmetry is expressed by an additional term in Ampère’s law and by another key equation of electromagnetism called Faraday’s law. We also discuss how moving a wire through a magnetic field produces a potential difference.

Lastly, we describe applications of these principles, such as the card reader shown in Abbildung 1. The black strip found on the back of credit cards and driver’s licenses is a very thin layer of magnetic material with information stored on it. Reading and writing the information on the credit card is done with a swiping motion. The physical reason why this is necessary is called electromagnetic induction and is discussed in this chapter.

4.1 Recap of magnetic Field

The first productive experiments concerning the effects of time-varying magnetic fields were performed by Michael Faraday in 1831. One of his early experiments is represented in the simulation in Abbildung 2 - in the tab Pickup Coil. An potential difference is induced when the magnetic field in the coil is changed by pushing a bar magnet into or out of the coil. This potential difference can generate a current, when the circuit is closed. Potential differences of opposite signs are produced by motion in opposite directions, and the directions of potential differences are also reversed by reversing poles. The same results are produced if the coil is moved rather than the magnet — it is the relative motion that is important. The faster the motion, the greater the potential difference, and there is no potential difference when the magnet is stationary relative to the coil.

Faraday also discovered that a similar effect can be produced using two circuits: a changing current in one circuit induces a current in a second, nearby circuit. An example for this can be shown in the simulation in the tab Transformer. When the source is changed into AC and the coils are moved nearer together, the light bulb of the second circuit momentarily lights up, indicating that a short-lived current surge has been induced in that circuit.

Faraday realized that in both experiments, a current flowed in the „receiving“ circuit when the magnetic field in the region occupied by that circuit was changing. As the magnet was moved, the strength of its magnetic field at the loop changed; and when the current in AC circuit changed periodically, the strength of its magnetic field at circuit 2 changed. Faraday was eventually able to interpret these and all other experiments involving magnetic fields that vary with time in terms of the following law:

The magnetic flux is a measurement of the amount of magnetic field lines through a given surface area, as seen in Abbildung 3. The magnetic flux is the amount of magnetic field lines cutting through a surface area defined by the surface vector $\vec{A}$. If the angle between the $\vec{A} = A\cdot \vec{n}$ and magnetic field vector $\vec{B}$ is parallel or antiparallel, as shown in the diagram, the abolute value of the magnetic flux is the highest possible value given the values of area and magnetic field.

This definition lead to a magnetic flux similar to the electric flux studied earlier:

\begin{align*} \Phi_m = \iint_A \vec{B} \cdot d \vec{A} \end{align*}

Therefore, the induced potential difference generated by a conductor or coil moving in a magnetic field is

\begin{align*} \boxed{ U_{ind} = -{{d \Phi_m}\over{dt}} = -{{d}\over{dt}}\iint_A \vec{B} \cdot d \vec{A} } \end{align*}

The negative sign describes the direction in which the induced potential difference drives current around a circuit. However, that direction is most easily determined with a rule known as Lenz’s law, which we will discuss in the next subchapter.

Abbildung 4 depicts a circuit and an arbitrary surface $S$ that it bounds. Notice that $S$ is an open surface: The planar area bounded by the circuit is not part of the surface, so it is not fully enclosing a volume.

Since the magnetic field is a source free vortex field, the flux over a closed area is alway zero: $\Phi_m = \iint_{A} \vec{B} \cdot d \vec{A} = 0$.
By this, it can be shown that any open surface bounded by the circuit in question can be used to evaluate $\Phi_m$ (similar to the Gauss's law for current density). For example, $\Phi_m$ is the same for the various surfaces $S$, $S_1$, $S_2$ of the figure.

The SI unit for magnetic flux is the Weber (Wb), \begin{align*} [\Phi_m] = [B] \cdot [A] = 1 T \cdot m^2 = 1Wb \end{align*}

Occasionally, the magnetic field unit is expressed as webers per square meter ($Wb/m^2$) instead of teslas, based on this definition. In many practical applications, the circuit of interest consists of a number $N$ of tightly wound turns (similar to Abbildung 5). Each turn experiences the same magnetic flux $\Phi_m$. Therefore, the net magnetic flux through the circuits is $N$ times the flux through one turn, and Faraday’s law is written as

\begin{align*} u_{ind} = -{{d}\over{dt}}(N \cdot \Phi_m) = -N \cdot {{d \Phi_m}\over{dt}} \end{align*}

4.2 Lenz Law

The direction in which the induced potential difference drives current around a wire loop can be found through the negative sign. However, it is usually easier to determine this direction with Lenz’s law, named in honor of its discoverer, Heinrich Lenz (1804–1865). (Faraday also discovered this law, independently of Lenz.) We state Lenz’s law as follows:

Lenz’s law can also be considered in terms of conservation of energy. If pushing a magnet into a coil causes current, the energy in that current must have come from somewhere. If the induced current causes a magnetic field opposing the increase in field of the magnet we pushed in, then the situation is clear. We pushed a magnet against a field and did work on the system, and that showed up as current. If it were not the case that the induced field opposes the change in the flux, the magnet would be pulled in produce a current without anything having done work. Electric potential energy would have been created, violating the conservation of energy.

To determine an induced potential difference $u_{ind}$, you first calculate the magnetic flux $\Phi_m$ and then obtain $d\Phi_m / dt$. The magnitude of $u_{ind}$ is given by

\begin{align*} |u_{ind}| &= \left|-{{d}\over{dt}}\Phi_m\right| \end{align*}

Finally, you can apply Lenz’s law to determine the sense of $u_{ind}$. This will be developed through examples that illustrate the following problem-solving strategy.

Let’s apply Lenz’s law to the system of Abbildung 5. We designate the “front” of the closed conducting loop as the region containing the approaching bar magnet, and the “back” of the loop as the other region. The north pole of the magnet moves toward the loop. Therefore, the flux through the loop due to the field of the magnet increases because the strength of field lines directed from the front to the back of the loop is increasing. A current is consequently induced in the loop. By Lenz’s law, the direction of the induced current must be such that its own magnetic field is directed in a way to oppose the changing flux caused by the field of the approaching magnet. Hence, the induced current circulates so that its magnetic field lines through the loop are directed from the back to the front of the loop. By the rigth hand rule, place your thumb pointing against the magnetic field lines, which is toward the bar magnet. Your fingers wrap in a counterclockwise direction as viewed from the bar magnet. Alternatively, we can determine the direction of the induced current by treating the current loop as an electromagnet that opposes the approach of the north pole of the bar magnet. This occurs when the induced current flows as shown, for then the face of the loop nearer the approaching magnet is also a north pole.

Part (b) of the figure shows the south pole of a magnet moving toward a conducting loop. In this case, the flux through the loop due to the field of the magnet increases because the number of field lines directed from the back to the front of the loop is increasing. To oppose this change, a current is induced in the loop whose field lines through the loop are directed from the front to the back. Equivalently, we can say that the current flows in a direction so that the face of the loop nearer the approaching magnet is a south pole, which then repels the approaching south pole of the magnet. By the rigth hand rule, your thumb points away from the bar magnet. Your fingers wrap in a clockwise fashion, which is the direction of the induced current.

4.3 Motional Induction

Magnetic flux depends on three factors:

• the strength of the magnetic field,
• the area through which the field lines pass, and
• the orientation of the field with the surface area.

If any of these quantities varies, a corresponding variation in magnetic flux occurs. So far, we’ve only considered flux changes due to a changing field. Only the causing magnet was moving. This type of induction is called static induction (or stationary induction, in German: Ruheinduktion).

Now we look at another possibility: a changing area through which the field lines pass including a change in the orientation of the area. This leads us to motional induction

Two examples of this type of flux change are represented in Abbildung 7.

• In part (a), the magnetic flux changes as a loop moves into a magnetic field. The flux through the rectangular loop increases as it moves into the magnetic field,
• In part (b), magnetic flux changes as a loop rotates in a magnetic field. The flux through the rotating coil varies with the angle $\varphi$.

It’s interesting to note that what we perceive as the cause of a particular flux change actually depends on the frame of reference we choose. For example, if you are at rest relative to the moving coils of Abbildung 7 (b), you would see the flux vary because of a changing magnetic field. In part (a), the field moves from left to right in your reference frame, and in part (b), the field is rotating. It is often possible to describe a flux change through a coil that is moving in one particular reference frame in terms of a changing magnetic field in a second frame, where the coil is stationary. However, reference-frame questions related to magnetic flux are beyond this introduction. We’ll avoid such complexities by always working in a frame at rest relative to the laboratory and explain flux variations as due to either a changing field or a changing area.

Single Rod

The first step to investigate the motional induction is shown in Abbildung 8: a single conducting rod with the length $\vec{l}$ which is moving with a constant velocity $\vec{v}$ through a homogenous magnetic field $\vec{B} \perp \vec{v} \perp \vec{l}$.

• The charges in the rod experience the Lorentz force $\vec{F}_L$.
• By this force, the positive charges move to one end of the rod and the negative to the other one.
• The separted charges create a patential difference and by this a Coulomb force $\vec{F}_C$ onto the charges within the rod.
• For a constant speed, the Lorentz force onto charges in the rod must have the same magnitude as the Coulomb force.

This leads to:

\begin{align*} \vec{F}_C &= - \vec{F}_L \\ Q \cdot \vec{E}_{ind} &= - Q \cdot \vec{v} \times \vec{B} \\ \vec{E}_{ind} &= - \vec{v} \times \vec{B} \\ \end{align*}

The induced potential difference in the rod will be:

\begin{align*} U_{ind} &= \int_l \vec{E}_{ind} \cdot d \vec{s} \\ &= - \int^0_1 \vec{v} \times \vec{B} \cdot d \vec{s} \\ \end{align*}

For constant $|\vec{v}|$ and $|\vec{B}|$ this leads to: \begin{align*} U_{ind} &= - v \cdot B \cdot l \\ \end{align*}

Rod in Circuit

Now let’s look at the conducting rod pulled in a circuit, changing magnetic flux. The area enclosed by the circuit '0123' of Abbildung 9 is $l\cdot x$ and is perpendicular to the magnetic field.

The velocity of the rod is $v=dx/dt$. So the induced potential difference will get \begin{align*} U_{ind} &= - v \cdot B \cdot l \\ &= - {{dx}\over{dt}} \cdot B \cdot l \\ &= - {{B \cdot l \cdot dx}\over{dt}} \\ &= - {{B \cdot dA}\over{dt}} \\ &= - {{d\Phi_m}\over{dt}} \\ \end{align*}

This is an alternative way to deduce Faraday's Law.

The current $I_{ind}$ induced in the given circuit is $U_{ind}$ divided by the resistance $R$

\begin{align*} I_{ind} = {{v \cdot B \cdot l }\over{R}} \end{align*}

Furthermore, the direction of the induced potential difference satisfies Lenz’s law, as you can verify by inspection of the figure.

The situation of the single rod can be interpreted in the following way: We can calculate a motionally induced potential difference with Faraday’s law even when an actual closed circuit is not present. We simply imagine an enclosed area whose boundary includes the moving conductor, calculate $\Phi_m$ , and then find the potential difference from Faraday’s law. For example, we can let the moving rod of Abbildung 10 be one side of the imaginary rectangular area represented by the dashed lines. The area of the rectangle is $A=lx$, so the magnetic flux through it is $\Phi= B\cdot lx$. Differentiating this equation, we obtain

\begin{align*} U_{ind} &= - {{d}\over{dt}} \cdot \Phi_m \\ &= - B \cdot l \cdot {{dx}\over{dt}} \\ &= - B \cdot l \cdot v \\ \end{align*}

which is identical to the potential difference between the ends of the rod that we determined earlier.

4.4 Self-Induction

Linked Flux

When looking onto the magnetic field in a coil multiple windings capture the passing flux, see Abbildung 14 (a). Each winding will create a potential difference. It can also be interpreted in such a way that the flux is going through the closed surface of the circuit multiple times (in the picture (b)).

The resulting electric voltage in such a situation given by the sum of the induced potential differences in each winding.

\begin{align*} u_{ind} &= - {{d \Phi_{sum}}\over{dt}} \\ &= - \sum_{i=1}^n {{d \Phi_{i}}\over{dt}} \\ \end{align*}

The linked flux $\Psi$ is defined as the resulting flux given by the sum of the partial fluxes of the closed ciruit.

\begin{align*} \boxed{ \Psi = \sum_{i=1}^n \Phi_{i} } \end{align*}

The linked flux simplifies the induced electric voltage of a coil to:

\begin{align*} u_{ind} &= - N \cdot {{d \Phi}\over{dt}} \\ &= - {{d}\over{dt}} \Psi \\ \end{align*}

Self-Induction

Up to now, we investigated the induction of electric voltages and currents based on the change of an external flux $d\Psi / dt$. For the induced current $i_{ind}$, we found that it counteracts the change of the external flux (Lenz law).

But what happens, when there is no external field - only a coil which creates the flux change itself?

The created field density of the coil can be derived from Ampere's Circuital Law

\begin{align*} \theta(t) &= \int & \vec{H}(t) \cdot d\vec{s} \\ &= \int & \vec{H}_{inner}(t) \cdot d\vec{s} &+ & \int \vec{H}_{outer}(t) \cdot d\vec{s} \\ &= \int & \vec{H}(t) \cdot d\vec{s} &+ & 0 \\ &= & {H}(t) \cdot l \\ \end{align*}

With magnetic voltage $\theta(t) = N \cdot i$ this lead to the magnetic flux density $B(t)$

\begin{align*} N \cdot i &= {H}(t) \cdot l \\ {H}(t) &= {{N \cdot i }\over {l}} \\ {B}(t) &= \mu \cdot {{N \cdot i }\over {l}} \\ \end{align*}

Based on the magnetic flux density $B(t)$ it is possible to calculate the flux $\Phi(t)$:

\begin{align*} \Phi(t) &= \iint_A \vec{B}(t) \cdot d\vec{A} \\ &= \iint_A \mu \cdot {{N \cdot i }\over {l}} \cdot dA \\ &= \mu \cdot {{N \cdot i }\over {l}} \cdot A \\ \end{align*}

The changing flux $\Phi$ is now creating an induced electric voltage and current, which counteracts the initial change of the current. This effect is called Self Induction. The induced electric voltage $u_{ind}$ is given by:

\begin{align*} u_{ind} &= - N \cdot {{d \Phi(t)}\over{dt}} \\ &= - N \cdot {{d (\mu \cdot {{N \cdot i }\over {l}} \cdot A)}\over{dt}} \\ &= - N \cdot \mu \cdot {{N \cdot A }\over {l}} \cdot {{di}\over{dt}} \\ \end{align*}

\begin{equation} \boxed{ u_{ind} = - \mu \cdot N^2 \cdot {{A }\over {l}} \cdot {{di}\over{dt}} \\ } \\ \text{for a long coil} \end{equation}

The result means that the induced electric voltage $u_{ind}$ is proportional to the change of the current ${{d}\over{dt}}i$. The proportionality factor is also called Self-inductance $L$ (or often simply called inductance).

4.5 Inductance

The inductance is another passive basic component of the electric circuit. Beside the ohmic resistor $R$ and the capacitor $C$, the inductor $L$ is the lump component entailing the inductivity.

Generally the inductance is defined by: \begin{equation} \boxed{ L = \left|{{u_{ind}}\over{di / dt}}\right| \\ } \end{equation}

The inductivity $L$ can also be described differently based on Lenz law $u_{ind} = - {{d}\over{dt}}\Psi(t)$ :

\begin{align*} L &= \left|{{u_{ind}}\over{di / dt}}\right| \\ &= {{{d \Psi(t)}/{dt}}\over{di / dt}} \\ \end{align*}

\begin{equation} \boxed{ L = {{ \Psi(t)}\over{i}} } \end{equation}

One can also consider an inductor a conservative: it does not like to see abrupt changes of the passing current. It reacts to any change in the current with a counteracting voltage, since the current change lead to a changing flux and - therefore - an induced voltage. The Abbildung 17 shows an inductor in series with a resistor and a switch (any real switch also behaves as a capacitor, when open). Once the simulation is started, the inductor directly counteracts the current, which is why the current only slowly increases.

Inductivity of different Components

Long Coil

In the last sub-chapter, the formula of a long coil was already investigated. By these, the inductivity of a long coil is

\begin{equation} \boxed{L_{long \; coil} = \mu \cdot N^2 \cdot {{A }\over {l}}} \end{equation}

Toroidal Coil

The toroidal coil was analysed in the last chapter(see magnetic Field Strength Part 1: Toroidal Coil). Here, a rectangular intersection a assumed (see Abbildung 18).

This leads to

\begin{equation} H(t) = {{N \cdot i}\over {l}} \end{equation}

with the length of the average field line $l = \pi(r_o+r_i)$:

\begin{equation} H(t) = {{N \cdot i}\over { \pi(r_o+r_i)}} \end{equation}

The inductivity $L$ can be calculated by

\begin{align*} L_{toroidal \; coil} &= {{ \Psi(t)}\over{i}} \\ &= {{ N \cdot \Phi(t)}\over{i}} \\ \end{align*}

With the magnetic flux density $B(t) = \mu H(t) = \mu {{i \cdot N }\over {l}}$ and the cross section $A = h(r_o-r_i)$, we get:

\begin{align*} \quad \quad L_{toroidal \; coil} &= {{ N \cdot \mu {{i \cdot N }\over { \pi(r_o+r_i)}} \cdot h(r_o-r_i)}\over{i}} \\ &= {{ N^2 \cdot \mu \cdot h(r_o-r_i)}\over{ \pi(r_o+r_i)}} \\ \end{align*}

\begin{equation} \boxed{ L_{toroidal \; coil} = \mu \cdot N^2 \cdot {{ h(r_o-r_i)}\over{ \pi(r_o+r_i)}} } \end{equation}